Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by One Night In Hackney (talk | contribs) at 10:03, 17 August 2012 (17 August 2012: oops). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 10:03, 17 August 2012 by One Night In Hackney (talk | contribs) (17 August 2012: oops)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Marquis de la Eirron

Marquis de la Eirron (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Marquis de la Eirron.

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

17 August 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

Photgenical (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)


Same method as the previous sock detailed at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron/Archive#06 August 2012, with some subtlety thrown in. While the edit summaries (and the edits themselves) suggest other changes, what they are really doing is adding images uploaded by Marquis without mentioning that in the edit summary.

And that's every single edit they've made. Every single one just happens to be adding images uploaded by Marquis socks. If a clerk wants to say checkuser isn't needed I don't mind. 2 lines of K303 10:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC) 2 lines of K303 10:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Categories: