Misplaced Pages

Trincomalee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection: Dynamic IP user has repeatedly added false information to the article. obi2canibe 20:10, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Ivian Sarcos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection: -IP vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:04, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Ace Young (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection: A series of anon IPs claiming to be the singer himself has continually reverted this article to an absolutely puffy, self-serving hagiography with lots of words in capital letters, uncited extraordinary claims and many, many more issues. Another editor has left a note at the latest of the multiple IPs' talk pages, and yet another editor has noted the issue at Talk:Ace Young#Mr. Ace Young editing this article, all to no avail. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:01, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see only one problematic IP recently, and that IP hasn't edited the page in many hours. If they continue, your warnings should escalate.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:59, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

History of WWE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users keep trying to add a blank section called 'Reality Era' when there is no such era. Jayemd (talk) 19:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

 Support - For Semi, But I would say only for 2 month at least Lady of ROH

Douchebag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Again we're here to petition for extended Full Protection. Twice this week we've had to revert additions of Thomas Edison. It's been over a year since a constructive edit was done to this article that is a persistent target for juvenile vandalism. Any legitimate requests to edit can be done by Edit Request. Hasteur (talk) 17:23, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

List of Wii U games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection: There have been a lot of problems on this page lately with IPs adding unsourced or even rumored information. This problem shouldn't be lasting, though, since the console will launch in November. Chevsapher (talk) 16:09, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:48, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Bane in other media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I haven't contacted any of the parties about it, I'll leave that for the admin. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:53, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Volkswagen Beetle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – No reason to change name. Longstanding title with broad consensus per WP:COMMONNAME. Recent spate of move-warring prompted this report. Also see this. Δρ.Κ.  12:41, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Declined, a brief spat warrants discussion on the talk apge, not indefinite protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:37, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

For the record, the discussion has already taken place and it was decided to stay at the present name. This reversal of consensus seems to be a chronic problem by inexperienced users who misunderstand the WP:COMMONNAME policy as well as the current consensus. Δρ.Κ.  18:21, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Western Sahara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full-protection: Edit warring over one name. Haven't checked to see which was the previous status quo, but I think that won't matter if the users actually discuss the issue. CMD (talk) 11:18, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Taryn Terrell (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: to prevent future and current vandalism from happening again. --SCWA Ladies Champion (talk) 19:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) There's no vandalism—you're edit warring. I'd suggest you stop, or risk being blocked. David1217 21:07, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Kaitlyn (wrestler) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: several percateges of Vandalism do over the course of this year, alot of vandalism just this/last mounths --SCWA Ladies Champion (talk) 19:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) There's no vandalism—you're edit warring. I'd suggest you stop, or risk being blocked. David1217 21:07, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Current requests for unprotection

• WP:RFUP
• WP:RFPU

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

• WP:RFED

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Fulfilled/denied requests

Kuala Lumpur International Airport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection: Just as with Ethiopian Airlines destinations, IPs keep adding unsourced information, thus violating WP:V. Jetstreamer  14:11, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:41, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Kevin Mirallas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection: IP's constantly changing the player's club before his deal is complete. Spc 21 (talk) 13:29, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry about the ugly log.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:16, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

G-Dragon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Nsk92 (talk) 13:15, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:39, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Jew Watch (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: A disruptive user is IP hopping to reinstate inappropriate content to the talk page. One of his 3 accounts has already been blocked (79.138.3.117 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)), and I've requested the other two at AN3 here, but a temporary semi protection would be helpful to put an end to more hopping. Thanks.   — Jess· Δ♥ 00:48, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

 Support - Obtund 01:15, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

A sockpuppeter has been trying to Misplaced Pages:I just don't like itand refused to use TALK to why content is inappropriate, it seems more like its censorship because said puppeter does not like content and would rather not discuss what to be put into the article itself. thank you. a warning and a block on said disruptive user would be needed. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.53.83.107 (talk) 03:43, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

What! 77.53.83.107 is the user making disruptive edits, adding inappropriate info, and after it is removed puts it back on. Just block 77.53.83.107. Obtund 04:28, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 07:41, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

What of it is inappropriate info?and why would it not fit about the article? he is indeed wrong about the talmud though, the talmud is indeed very anti-non semitic. those quotes he gave are out of context. so while I assume that might be wrong, the other first that he is talking about is not. we can check up that event on wikipedia ourself since....well it happend on wiki where the jewish organisation camera tried manipulating wiki to favor jewish related articles.

what he sugested seems to be about countering jewjwatch statement about the reason they are doing it is because of the jewish Torah (the jewish holy book) However, based on the consensus on both jpgordon, stephen j and others, they disagree with the IP about it and find it completly wrong to be put into the article. I asume they mean some criticism that jewwatch makes are correct. that said, that does not mean people cant discuss why it shouldnt be in the article hm?79.138.2.55 (talk) 13:18, 18 August 2012 (UTC)