Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Holland & Hart - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MaNeMeBasat (talk | contribs) at 07:02, 1 May 2006 ([]: Comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 07:02, 1 May 2006 by MaNeMeBasat (talk | contribs) ([]: Comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Holland & Hart

NN as per WP:CORP: Librarianofages 02:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Criteria for companies and corporations A company or corporation is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria:

The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself. This criterion excludes: Media re-prints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about itself, and advertising for the company. 1 Trivial coverage, such as newspaper articles that simply report extended shopping hours or the publications of telephone numbers and addresses in business directories. This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations. 2 The company or corporation is listed on ranking indexes, produced by well-known and independent publications, of important companies. 3 4 The company's or corporation's share price is used to calculate stock market indices 5 6. Being used to calculate an index that simply comprises the entire market is excluded. ?

  • Comment: there is a link to WP:CORP (no need to copy conditions, we can read these conditions on original page). But, do I need to investigate notability? If the company meets WP:CORP as you claim (which criteria), prove this with certain external sources. I suppose you checked all these criteria, do you? --MaNeMeBasat 07:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)