Misplaced Pages

Intellectual dishonesty

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FeloniousMonk (talk | contribs) at 21:28, 2 May 2006 (rm merge tag. No interest, discussion since December 2005). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:28, 2 May 2006 by FeloniousMonk (talk | contribs) (rm merge tag. No interest, discussion since December 2005)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Intellectual dishonesty is the creation of misleading impressions through the use of rhetoric, logical fallacy, fraud, or misrepresented evidence. It may stem from an ulterior motive, haste, sloppiness, or external pressure to reach a certain conclusion. The truth value of work may be lost as a result.

Scientists and scholars generally consider plagiarism a serious form of intellectual dishonesty. Other examples include the incorrect attribution of a quotation or quotation out of context, use of obfuscated or irrelevant citations, deceptive omission of contextual text through ellipsis, and the unsupported amplification of a relationship.

Intellectual abuse

Often, individuals with experience or training in arguments can exploit certain strategies of persuasion or "spin". This also appears in overuse of esoteric terminology, or the use of unnecessary ideas in a sentence, like "per se". (see Academic elitism).

See also

Stub icon

This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: