Misplaced Pages

:Repetition in argumentation - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Paul Siebert (talk | contribs) at 19:56, 11 October 2012 (Undid revision 517183201 by Collect (talk)If you want your version to stay, feel free to move to your own talk page. Otherwise, don't behave as an owner.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:56, 11 October 2012 by Paul Siebert (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 517183201 by Collect (talk)If you want your version to stay, feel free to move to your own talk page. Otherwise, don't behave as an owner.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Essay on editing Misplaced Pages
This is an essay.
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Misplaced Pages contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Misplaced Pages's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
Sometimes, the person who posts the greatest amount of repeated verbiage to a discussion, is least likely to be correct.

There is also a corollary:

It happens that the person who is most insistent that only specific sources which he favours know the facts, is least likely to have found the best sources.

Comments

Category: