This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ptmccain (talk | contribs) at 01:43, 7 May 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:43, 7 May 2006 by Ptmccain (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing. — Jimbo Wales |
MoveI suppose that discussion is in the archive, it is not on the talk page. There is a note from someone who did the same thing as me though, at On the Jews and Their Lies (Martin Luther)#Title. Maybe there should be a comment there, with link to the prior discussion. // Habj 13:34, 20 April 2006 (UTC) Re: batting averagesI respectfully disagree. I know of a user who (as of last week or so when the tool server stopped updating) has made 891 edits to the same article, but somehow only averages 2.20 edits per page overall. Incredible, I know, but this user (you may know whom I'm talking about, so I don't have to mention his name) obviously does enough other work here to offset his apparent obsession. Also, he very rarely uses his admin tools at all, and never in matters where he's personally involved. For what it's worth, my edits/page is 1.39, so I guess I'm sort of useless. Will we be able to say that much for the present candidate in a few months? If I was more confident in that, I might support. Knowing the details of the 3RR block would also be helpful. — Apr. 20, '06 <freakofnurxture|talk>
DershowitzPlease stop removing material from Alan Dershowitz. - Xed 17:04, 20 April 2006 (UTC) stop your thuggery. - Xed 17:12, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
I owe an apologySlim Virgin, I owe you an apology, and with this post I am offering one to you. I am glad that we have administrators as well versed in WP policies as you are. I want to be constructive, not destructive. I will try to be more helpful to Misplaced Pages. Drboisclair 22:09, 20 April 2006 (UTC) Anon IP using talk pages as soap boxHi Slim, Anon IP 195.70.32.136 (talk · contribs) has had a history of making inflammatory comments in talk pages (out of the last 50 contributions, only 2 have been to non-talk pages). Several users have commented on this on the IP's talk page, but the anon hasn't got into too much trouble as (s)he only comments once in any given page. It seems like the anon knows a bit about the rules, as POV is expressed in talk rather than main articles. Is a user-conduct RFC a good idea, or could it make things worse? Thanks, Andjam 12:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC) PTMccainSince this is a new user, I suggest you try talking to him, rather than threatening him. Also, since this is on a page you are editing, I want it on record that you have a conflict of interest as far as admin duties go. If you do not like what he is doing, call in another admin. --CTSWyneken 13:17, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Lumiere RfCMay I ask why you reverted MonkeySage's removal of Askolnick's comment? It seems close enough to a personal attack to merit removal. JoshuaZ |