This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 14:03, 26 October 2012 (Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 3d) to User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive 37.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:03, 26 October 2012 by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) (Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 3d) to User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive 37.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This is NuclearWarfare's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
 Archives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Antidiskriminator at AE
G'day NuclearWarfare, can I ask you and the other admins that have commented on this report to keep an eye on the current RM at Talk:Territory_of_the_Military_Commander_in_Serbia#Proposing_a_move_in_good_faith? It was agreed it would stay open for 14 days, but it is now nearly 21 days, and most admins with a sense of self-preservation may have taken one look and hit the back button. It might be appropriate that closure there (whichever way it goes) is done by an admin from the AE discussion so that there is consistency between the decisions, particularly if a move ban is implemented. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (talk) 09:09, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- It appears to have closed by another user; would you like me to take another look? NW (Talk) 05:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)