This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Renamed user qh37rbwki62h19772b (talk | contribs) at 02:06, 13 November 2012 (Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sanderson's First Law closed as merge to Brandon Sanderson). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:06, 13 November 2012 by Renamed user qh37rbwki62h19772b (talk | contribs) (Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sanderson's First Law closed as merge to Brandon Sanderson)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This article was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 November 2012 with a consensus to merge the content into the article Brandon Sanderson. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use the destination article's talk page. (November 2012) |
Sanderson's First Law is the first law developed by epic fantasy author Brandon Sanderson for use in designing settings for genre writers. While originally created as a rule for magic systems in fantasy novels, Sanderson has specified that this law need not apply just to fantasy, but is applicable to science fiction as well.
Sanderson's First Law
- Sanderson's First Law. An author's ability to solve conflict satisfactorily with magic is directly proportional to how well the reader understands said magic.
This Law was originally defined in Sanderson's essay, "Sanderson's First Law" located on his website. In the essay he qualifies the two extremes of design as being:
- Magic/technology has well defined rules that the audience understands. As a result, one can use this to solve conflict more easily as the capabilities are cleanly defined. Sanderson classifies this as "Hard Magic". C.L. Wilson in her essay "Worldbuilding 101 - Making Magic" advocated this method of creation, stating, "...create your rules, then follow them."
- Magic/technology has unclear or vague rules, or none at all. This allows for a greater sense of wonder to be attained for the reader, but the ability to solve problems without resorting to deus ex machina decreases. Sanderson classifies this as "Soft Magic". Lawrence Watt-Evans specifically advised "The trick is to be a benevolent and consistent deity, not one who pulls miracles out of a hat as needed"
Additional information
Since the creation of the first, Sanderson has developed a rudimentary second law:
- Sanderson's Second Law: Limits > Powers
Sanderson's Second Law was initially set down in Episode 14 of the podcast Writing Excuses. John Brown, likewise looked to Sanderson's work in his own essay involving magic systems, noting "What are the ramifications and conflicts of using it?" Patricia Wrede likewise noted several issues on this topic ranging from magic suppressing other technologies, to how a magic might affect farming.
Notes
- 1. In the essay, Sanderson clarifies, "Most writers are somewhere in the middle between these two extremes."
- 2. From the same episode, this law is also called Tayler's First Law. "If the energy you are getting from your magic is cheaper than letting a donkey do it, your medieval economy just fell apart."
See also
References
- ^ Sanderson, Brandon. "Sanderson's First Law". Retrieved 10 February 2011.
- Wilson, C.L. "Worldbuilding 101 - Making Magic". Retrieved 12 February 2011.
- Watt-Evans, Lawrence. "Deus ex Machina and Writing Fantasy". Retrieved 12 February 2011.
- Sanderson, Brandon; Howard Tayler, Dan Wells (18 May 2008). "Writing Excuses Episode 15: Costs and Ramifications of Magic". www.writingexcuses.com (Podcast). Retrieved 10 February 2011.
{{cite podcast}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Brown, John. "Inventing Magic". Retrieved 12 February 2011.
- Wrede, Patricia. "Fantasy Worldbuilding Questions: Daily Life". Retrieved 12 February 2011.
- Wrede, Patricia. "Fantasy Worldbuilding Questions: Commerce, Trade, and Public Life". Retrieved 12 February 2011.