Misplaced Pages

Computer-assisted personal interviewing

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EstherLP (talk | contribs) at 11:41, 21 November 2012 (rearranged some information). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 11:41, 21 November 2012 by EstherLP (talk | contribs) (rearranged some information)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Computer-assisted personal interviewing" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Part of a series on
Sociology
Key themes
Perspectives
Branches
Methods
Major theorists

1800s: Martineau · Tocqueville · Marx · Spencer · Le Bon · Ward · Pareto · Tönnies · Veblen · Simmel · Durkheim · Addams · Mead · Weber · Du Bois · Mannheim · Elias

1900s: Fromm · Adorno · Gehlen · Aron · Merton · Nisbet · Mills · Bell · Schoeck · Goffman · Bauman · Foucault · Luhmann · Habermas · Baudrillard · Bourdieu · Giddens
Lists

Computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) is an interviewing technique in which the respondent or interviewer uses a computer to answer the questions. It is similar to computer-assisted telephone interviewing, except that the interview takes place in person instead of over the telephone. This method has been classified as a personal interview technique since an interviewer is usually present to serve as a host and to guide the respondent. If no interviewer is present, the term Computer-assisted self interviewing (CASI) may be used. An example of a situation in which CAPI is used as the method of data collection is the British Crime Survey.


Characteristics of this interviewing technique are:

  • Either the respondent or an interviewer sits at a computer terminal and answers a questionnaire using the keyboard or mouse.
  • Help screens and courteous error messages are provided.
  • Colorful screens and on and off-screen stimuli can add to the respondent's interest and involvement in the task.
  • This approach is used in shopping malls, preceded by the intercept and screening process.
  • It is also used to conduct business-to-business research at trade shows or conventions.


Advantages

This form of interview is substantially cheaper when a large number of respondents is required, because

  • There is no need to recruit or pay interviewers.
  • There is no need to transcribe the results into a computer form. The computer program can be constructed so as to place the results directly in a format that can be read by statistical analysis programs such as PSPP or DAP.
  • The program can be placed on a web site, potentially attracting a world-wide audience.

Disadvantages

  • The survey is likely to attract only respondents who are "computer savvy", thus introducing potential bias to the survey.
  • The survey can miss feedback, provide clarification/quality control that a personal interviewer could provide (ex. lots of respondents think the question asks one thing, when it actually asks another)

Computer-assisted self interviewing

The big difference between a computer-assisted self interview (CASI) and a computer-assisted personal interview is whether or not an interviewer is present. There are two kinds of computer-assisted self interviewing, namely a "video-CASI" and a "telephone-CASI". Video-CASI are often used to make a complex questionnaire more understandable for the person that is being interviewed. Audio-CASI has the same advantage, but could also reduce problems that interviewees have with literacy. Furthermore, both types have a big advantage over computer-assisted personal interviewing, because subjects are more inclined to answer sensitive questions. The reason for this is that they feel that a CASI is more privative.

See also

Categories: