Misplaced Pages

:Requests for adminship/Megaman Zero 3 - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dr Zak (talk | contribs) at 11:32, 10 May 2006 ([]: o). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 11:32, 10 May 2006 by Dr Zak (talk | contribs) ([]: o)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Zero

(4/1/0) ending 11:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Megaman_Zero (talk · contribs) – Zero is a fine contributor to the project. Zero particpates in vandal fighting and handles abusive editors well. Zero also has many edits across most namespace areas. This is his third attempt at adminship, the first failing due to being too new, and the second with many stating they found him incivil, which was not my general impression, and in the three months since his last Rfa, I can find no evidence of anything other than useful, encyclopedic contributions. I think he will be a fine admin.--MONGO 03:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: -Accept. I've studied the comments left in my previous Rfa's, and hopefully, have amended them. -Zero 11:00, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support as nominator.--MONGO 11:23, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  2. Support Solid contributor & vandal fighter. --Srikeit 11:26, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  3. Strong support over 10,000 edits and not an admin yet !?!?! He obviously has a lot of experience here and would make a great admin. —Mets501 11:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  4. Support -- witnessed only valuable contributions. - Longhair 11:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose. Blocked twice last week, once for 3RR and once for incivility (towards me). Also for an incident where he basically forged an exceptional newcommer award on his user page: and . --Moby 11:30, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  2. Oppose. Sorry, no. I don't have a good feeling about this candidate. Dr Zak 11:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

  • As English Misplaced Pages is no longer replicating data to the toolserver, the user's edit count (as of 20:32, 8 may 2006 (UTC)) using Interiot's Tool 2 is:
Username Megaman_Zero
Total edits 10031
Distinct pages edited 2362
Average edits/page 4.033
First edit 14:16, 14 June 2005

(main) 4555
Talk 847
User 441
User talk 2148
Image 978
Image talk 5
Template 142
Template talk 18
Help 2
Category 17
Misplaced Pages 643
Misplaced Pages talk 198


Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Misplaced Pages backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: - I'm quite enamored about clearing out backlogs. I'm also heavily involved in image work about the wiki and would prefer the tools to take a more active role in thier management. I'd also prefer closing a few afd discussions every now and then. Essentially I'm interested in using the tools to assist the project as best I can.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Misplaced Pages, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: - I am currrently pursuing my dream of elevating my core articles to GA status, and at least one to FA status. I've created many articles, and as an experienced editor I feel it unacceptable I haven't achieved FA yet.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: - Not many. A recent conflict occured on Talk:Colonel (Mega Man). Nasty it was, too, abielt it was settled after I inquired many third opinions and provided appropriate sources and counter-rebuttals. I usually support my stance on conflicts with established concensus and wikipedia policy. I always hold an objective view concerning the encyclopedia and don't allow external conflicts to get in the way.