This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.224.43.225 (talk) at 07:59, 12 December 2012 (→Skipping too much). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:59, 12 December 2012 by 24.224.43.225 (talk) (→Skipping too much)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | United States: Television Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
USA Network to Canada Citation
I have a citation that this network could come to digital cable and satellite network in Canada —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.118.108.222 (talk) 16:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC).
Live Stream Link Dead
I have tried clicking on the link and it's confirmed that the link is actually a dead link. So there's no USA Network live stream. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 99.247.109.101 (talk) 01:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC).
What was this show?
I remember after Monk and The Dead Zone came on, I read an article talking about a new USA show about a cop who was shot in head, was "clinically dead for two minutes and clinically insane for two years", lost the ability to sense fear, and was now tackling tough cases. Does anyone know what the name of that show was? Evernut 00:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
no show like that, maybe some idoit started a rumor combining both plots of monk and the dead zone for some reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.70.92 (talk) 02:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
I found out what it was. I was thinking of the adaptation of Touching Evil. Evernut (talk) 22:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- The name of that show is "Touching Evil" starring Vera Farminga, produced by Bruce Willis and The Hughes Brothers. Coffee4binky (talk) 16:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Captain USA
Article needs to mention the Captain USA presenter, a Ghoulardi-type presence —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.110.223 (talk) 20:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- This article is too slanted on a "happy" stance towards the network, and not listing an shows, hosts, or general USAness that the network used to have before NBC bought 'em and turned them into the repeat channel. No mention of Cartoon Express or a links thereof.Coffee4binky (talk) 16:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
DARN RIGHT YOU ARE SIR! USA IS A SHELL OF ITS FORMER SELF! BRING BACK THE EXPLIOTATION AND HORROR!
Sharing time with BET and CSPAN?
The article mentions this occuring "at one time" but no clue as to when this occurred. I wonder if it was only the case that the person who added this factoid had their local provider share channel space that way, because it certainly never happened on my system. We got cable in 1982, and we always had USA, but didn't get BET until the late 90's, so maybe it happened earlier in USA's lifespan, but I doubt it. Likewise, TV Guide always listed them seperately in the edition for this area, despite what the article claims, leading me to further think it was just the editor's local cable system saving channels by making them share.76.234.130.39 (talk) 03:33, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- You are correct, sir! I have old newspapers and TV listing magazines from, oh, 1985 till today that have always listed USA as separate channel in the Prime Cable Las Vegas market. Also, this article states USA was a "minor" channel...when? Seemed major to me since at least 1984. Anyways, I do recall, somewhere in CA, when I was visiting in 1987, that BET and Bloomberg shared a channel, so it must be a cable system thing. Coffee4binky (talk) 16:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Removed "Logo controversy" section
I removed this text from the "Logo controversy" section:
Many have observed that the current version of the USA Network logo uses negative space to evoke the phallic image of a letter U and a letter A with two dueling penises.
It was unsourced, and it may qualify as vandalism, although I have to admit that it's strangely true if you look at the logo... Is there a legitimate external source that claims it's a "genuine" controversy? Skaraoke (talk) 05:46, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Really? Maybe dueling thumbs... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.111.67.213 (talk) 05:49, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Skipping too much
There's not enough description of the channel during the 1980s and 1990s. Weird Science, Campus Cops, the repeats of Highlander, Renegade, Parker Lewis, no Cartoon Express mention, etc. This article reads more like a NBC promo of the station that a cable provider might get if deciding to carry the station. A true encyclopaedia article of the channel would have a general, but detailed, history section. Such history can be researched on the 'Net as well as libraries and such that carry cable industry trades, and I'm sure just looking at TV Guide's archives (somehow) will yield results as well. Sierraoffline444 (talk) 13:45, 29 January 2010 (UT DARN RIGHT YOU ARE SIR.
Don't forget the old, censored, sorftcore porn they use to show (usually beginning or ending with the word "bikini"). Puberty just wouldn't have been the same without them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.190.129.50 (talk) 04:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Where is the mention of USA Up All Night and all the expliotation and horror film they use to show? If it weren't for USA showing films like The Toxic Avenger and Spookies I would proble not be who I am today! Use to love it back in the days Late 80's and early 90's. (user:Grindhousezombie) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.26.191.60 (talk) 02:14, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
- What article are you people reading? I see plenty of content about USA's old programming. While I realize the first comment is two years old, I bet the article did mention Cartoon Express' back then. And the T&A movies you guys are getting all worked up about are mentioned -- in the USA Up All Night article. That's because that is the show were those much beloved by adolescent boys aired. The whole channel didn't consist of those films, it was one programming block. People seem to confuse Misplaced Pages with a some sort of goofy fan blog that should include every little detail about a topic. Just 'cause you remember it doesn't mean it is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Gotta admit though, the "true encyclopaedia article" blabber is kind of funny. Do you guys really think the Encyclopædia Britannica would have a page or two devoted to the USA Network and their history of showing bad, heavily edited movies that young boys got excited over? Hoooo! That's a good one24.224.43.225 (talk) 07:59, 12 December 2012 (UTC)