Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Boundsdh (talk | contribs) at 14:21, 14 December 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

*/Archive 1: July, 2005 – June, 2006 */Archive 2: June 2-3, 2006 */Archive 3: June 3-20, 2006 */Archive 4: June 30 – July 18, 2006 */Archive 5: July 19 - September 8, 2006 */Archive 6: September 9 - October 5, 2006 */Archive 7: October 7 - November 26, 2006 */Archive 8: November 27, 2006 - February 12, 2007 */Archive 9: February 13, 2007 - March 3, 2007 */Archive 10: March 3, 2007 - March 11, 2007 */Archive 11: March 11, 2007 - April 1, 2007 */Archive 12: April 1, 2007 - April 9, 2007 */Archive 13: April 9, 2007 - April 28, 2007 */Archive 14: April 29, 2007 - May 14, 2007 */Archive 15: May 15, 2007 - May 23, 2007 */Archive 16: May 23, 2007 - June 15, 2007 */Archive 17: June 15, 2007 - July 8, 2007 */Archive 18: July 8, 2007 - August 2, 2007 */Archive 19: August 2, 2007 - August 19, 2007

Feel free to leave comments at the bottom of the page.

• Please sign your comments with ~~~~.
• If you are here to complain about something I deleted please tell me the name of the specific article.

It should go without saying that trolling, vandalism, and personal attacks will be promptly removed. Thanks. IrishGuy

203.89.172.130

thanks for blocking this vandal Jru Gordon 02:37, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

No problem. :) IrishGuy 02:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

170.215.153.80

There is a guy on this IP who makes random changes to Transformers articles which are nonsensical. I have to constantly monitor it and revert them. Can he be blocked? user_talk:mathewignash —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 02:51, August 20, 2007 (UTC).

He hasn't received any warnings for vandalism. You can find warning templates at WP:UTM and if he persists, you can report him at WP:AIV. IrishGuy 02:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Wrestling

Why are you deleting my articles? i'm just doing this for my wrestling association

please answer —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bergurking (talk • contribs) 19:04, August 21, 2007 (UTC).

Bergurking 19:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC) do you know more about iceland then me frosti bergsson is an icelandic millionare bergur frostason is an icelandic wrestler and rwa is a wrestling promotion

answer me —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bergurking (talk • contribs) 19:08, August 21, 2007 (UTC).

Please read WP:COI. You shouldn't be writing about an organization you are affiliated with. Beyond that, you created a single sentence article about a person with no assertion of importance and no references at all. IrishGuy 19:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion

Sir, It is evident that you don't want the other readers of wikipedia to see the content of that link. This links is evidently appropriate for the subject covered and presents an alternative view of the same subject treated here. The fact that it does not say that this document is a fraud bothers you, so you have made an excuse for it to remove it. You try to look cool, but you have been dishonest with me at worst or grossly negligent in your comments at best. Please provide a precise explanation why you want to censor this link (your response was merely a cut and paste of wikipedia policy and does not apply here, evidently). No alternative opinion or view is expressed in this document as it should be to keep it neutral. Regards. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.218.11.70 (talk)

Removing spam isn't "censoring". It isn't a reliable source, it isn't even remotely neutral or encyclopedic. It is spam. Stop. IrishGuy 20:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

You are calling names but you refuse to respond. Labeling webistes "spam" does necessarily make them so. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.218.11.70 (talk) 20:56, August 21, 2007 (UTC)

I did respond. The fact that you don't happen to like the response doesn't negate it. IrishGuy 21:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Clive Barker sites

You seem to be erasing two legitimate Clive Barker sites used as references for various articles, including some articles for which I can personally vouch has having use those sites. I'd like to show good faith that you are not simply removing these sites out of a dislike for the author Barker. You are, however, methodically erasing these through Misplaced Pages, and I'm not sure how one can be confident that they were never used as reference. Any talk-page explanation on these sites would be appropriate; saying just "linkspam" doesn't fully give reasoning regarding what seem to be standard non-commercial websites. Thanks. --Tenebrae 23:42, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

A year ago 85.210.225.157 simply spammed these links into about fifty article. No content was added, simply the highly promotional link about the link having a archive of fascinating comment. In Clive Barker's article...fine. In the fifty other articles they were spammed into...no. IrishGuy 23:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me. I did look through some of the Barker links elsewhere, and they were indeed appended with promotional comments. I've no input as to those links, and can only say the Barker/Razorline links were legit. You might want to check if some of the other ones you removed were OK, i.e., had no appended promo statements. In any case, thanks again for the collegial collaboration. Cheers, --Tenebrae 02:01, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

No problem. If they belonged in an article (e.g. Clive Barker, Cenobite, etc.) I mainly left them in place...but the bulk of them were clearly promotional and added to many articles where they just didn't belong (e.g. a link to the website because Barker wrote a forward to a book once). IrishGuy 02:04, 22 August 2007 (UTC)