Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KleenupKrew (talk | contribs) at 20:36, 12 May 2006 (→[]: delete delete delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

7/7 Truth Movement

No secondary sources, original research; link farm for conspiracy sites. Tom Harrison 14:03, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Notable and verifiable. --Irishpunktom\ 14:31, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It certainly is worth keeping, I cannot seriously believe it would be considered for an AfD!I know the website is moved after a hack and is being put on a free hosting site temporarily, but it will be back, under different titles but this is the main. References to the actual title is What is happening to Misplaced Pages? Do the government have a hand in it? LOL In fairness, I was warned about this. I say keep, it is extremily notable and verifiable and is only growing. As with 9/11 Truth Movement it is not "official" but is a loose knit group happy to be under this title. I believe THIS is the temporary site, I will check with my contacts. FK0071a 15:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Comment- According to his user page, User:FK0071a is a member of this group. :) Dlohcierekim 20:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. As the article says, "The 7/7 Truth Movement is informal, decentralized and occasionally fractious", which I translate, probably unjustifiably, to mean "The 7/7 Truth Movement is three men and a dog with an internet connection who argue with everyone they meet and don't get on terribly well with each other, either". They certainly don't seem to have had any influence whatsoever on the national debate. NN conspiracy nonsense. Vizjim 15:20, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Comment - true, however, this doesn't seem to apply to the case of the 9/11 Truth Movement and I do not see that up for an AfD! Also, under Alex Jones the 7/7 Truth Movement are making a documentary along the lines of the 911 In Plane Site and 9-11: The Road to Tyranny documentaries.

• Keep, just as real, verifiable and encyclopedic as the 9/11 Truth Movement --Striver 15:30, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Wow, a MySpace link to a blog! That is sure notability proven! User:Zoe| 18:27, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment If this article is deleted I will nominate the 9/11 Truth Movement for deletion. That article's existence is not proof of anything: it has not been nominated for deletion and its legitimacy has not been discussed. Vizjim 16:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: Save us all the trouble and read WP:POINT first. TheProject 18:52, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This page does not give an opinion but merely provides an explanation itto the movement. it doesnt at any time give any give an opinion top the validity of the statement. It is also verifiable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monkeychild222 (talk • contribs)

Comment- User:Monkeychild222 created May 11, 2206 and has four edits.

• Delete - As a link farm and OR. Kilo-Lima| 16:44, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Kilo-Lima above; no verification that there is a formal organization other than people holding a common viewpoint. --mtz206 16:49, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, three Google hits for "7/7 Truth Movement". User:Zoe| 18:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Very small number of google hits for the term. If the article is kept, the term will perpetuate. Misplaced Pages shouldn't be used in this way. See Misplaced Pages:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_publisher_of_original_thought. -Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 18:47, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Vizjim. --Nydas 18:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no evidence provided a notable movement exists, fails google test spectacularly. Non-notable club, CSD A7 applies. Weregerbil 18:54, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nonotable by many standards. --Mmx1 20:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

to creator of article: Welcome to wikiland!

To others:

A 7/7 truth movement is emerging. So far, the most comprehensive introduction we have seen is at Julyseventh.co.uk. This well-organized compendium includes a discussion of possible scenarios, a growing timeline, archives of news stories, many links to other 7/7 skeptics, the widely-distributed "77 Unanswered Questions About 7/7," by John Doe II, and a section on the relevance of 9/11. --Striver 20:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Huh? --mtz206 20:14, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - Worth keeping.Jordy 20:16, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per all above.  :) Dlohcierekim 20:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. What a world we live in. Any nobody with an extreme opinion and a big mouth can put up a website and suddenly be "notable" enough for an encyclopedia article about themselves. KleenupKrew 20:36, 12 May 2006 (UTC)