This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hex (talk | contribs) at 21:15, 29 December 2012 (→Minor edits, again: Blocked from editing for 24 hours.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:15, 29 December 2012 by Hex (talk | contribs) (→Minor edits, again: Blocked from editing for 24 hours.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Minor edits, again
I'm trying my best to assume good faith here, but this is not an appropriate use of the minor edit label. Likewise, the edit summary you specified was completely insufficient. — Hex (❝?!❞) 17:49, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- The "RK" in the edit summary stands for "Rüdesheimer Kaffee". Please revert if the edit is wrong. — O'Dea (talk) 19:46, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm aware of that. A cryptic acronym of content you've added to an article is not a valid edit summary. Please familiarize yourself with the correct use of the feature. — Hex (❝?!❞) 14:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Something really helpful like this, perhaps? Go here – which you should have already done, by the way – and learn about edit summaries and then come back if you want my help. — O'Dea (talk) 14:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Touch a nerve, did I? Keep taking the piss and see what happens. — Hex (❝?!❞) 18:55, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- The nerve touched was yours, wasn't it? Because pointing out your hypocrisy is not "taking the piss". Go read the edit summary information then come back and tell me precisely what part of it you think I violated (hint: not any of it). Then we can have a discussion. — O'Dea (talk) 19:43, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Touch a nerve, did I? Keep taking the piss and see what happens. — Hex (❝?!❞) 18:55, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Something really helpful like this, perhaps? Go here – which you should have already done, by the way – and learn about edit summaries and then come back if you want my help. — O'Dea (talk) 14:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm aware of that. A cryptic acronym of content you've added to an article is not a valid edit summary. Please familiarize yourself with the correct use of the feature. — Hex (❝?!❞) 14:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Okay, time out.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
You can take this break from the editing to study the part of Help:Edit summary that says
- Summarise. Summarise the change, even if only briefly; even a short summary is better than no summary.
- Explain. Give reasons for the change, if there is a reasonable chance that other editors may be unclear as to why it was made.
and consider how you ought to have described the addition of textual content to a page. — Hex (❝?!❞) 21:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)