Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dirtlawyer1 (talk | contribs) at 22:30, 24 January 2013 (In the spirit of BRD, I have taken the liberty of merging the content to the main University of Florida article, and retasking the stand-alone article as a redirect.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

University of Florida Career Resource Center

University of Florida Career Resource Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

That this was ranked as good by Princeton Review doesn't mean the resource center gets to have its own article. I've never seen an article on a notable career resource center, and this is not one that deserves it. Drmies (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

• Delete WP:MILL student service similar to ones found in most colleges. It's mentioned in J. Wayne Reitz Union, as it probably should be, but I don't think it's worth a redirect. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 05:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 09:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 09:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

• Redirect. Subject is clearly notable based on the results of a simple Google News search and the WP:GNG criteria, but I question whether there is enough general interest encyclopedic content to justify a stand-alone article. Any encyclopedic content not already duplicated by the J. Wayne Reitz Student Union or main University of Florida articles should be merged to the main University of Florida article, with a section-specific redirect to the same. Career placement is a key function of the university worthy of mention in the main article. As for the subject not being "worth a redirect," I gently remind Andrew that redirects are cheap (see essay "Misplaced Pages:Redirects are cheap"). Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 09:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
• Redirect. Should be redirected to an appropriate article. Information provided is informative and notable according to Princeton Review. Jccort (talk) 13:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
• Either delete or redirect to J. Wayne Reitz Union, per nom and Jccort. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 10:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

• Delete Not even worth redirection. A routine student service center at a university. The fact that the center exists is in the main article, and that's all the content needed. it's not a reasonable search term, so no need of a redirection. Redirects are cheap, but redirects when there's no significant information are confusing and have a negative value. DGG ( talk ) 03:11, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
• Comment. In the spirit of BRD, I have taken the liberty of merging the content to a two-paragraph section within the main University of Florida article. Given the relatively trivial difference between a redirect and deletion at this point, may I suggest that we close this AfD and move one to more productive AfD arguments? Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:30, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

• AfD debates (Organisation, corporation, or product)
• AfD debates
• Relisted AfD debates