This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Lady Catherine de Burgh (talk | contribs) at 17:29, 17 February 2013 (→Editor of the Week: you should stand for Arbcom; one can't help feeling the present members............). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:29, 17 February 2013 by The Lady Catherine de Burgh (talk | contribs) (→Editor of the Week: you should stand for Arbcom; one can't help feeling the present members............)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Rollback
Dear Lady Catherine (or, as I may again call you, mrs Rollbacker), welcome back to us! I noticed that you had apparently mislaid your rollback rights somewhere in the Alps or the Carribbean. I have reinstated them. Enjoy, and remember to only use the feature for obvious vandalism (not for the merely distasteful or middleclass). Bishonen | talk 23:08, 13 January 2013 (UTC).
Editor of the Week
As you so Royally observed at User:Wetmans page, your exalted status and buldging Trophy Case exclude you from consideration for this Award. It is designed to reward the common folk for their hard and dillegent efforts on behalf of The Encyclopedia. I ask your leave, dear Lady.....```Buster Seven Talk 15:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- I so admire projects that are "pour l'encouragement des autres" and am happy to lend my name and patronage to such schemes. May I say how nice it is to see such a nice, well brought up young man on my page; Wikipdia needs more like you - you should stand for Arbcom; one can't help feeling the present members (apart from poor, little Mrs Risker who's Canadian!) are rather 'infra dignitatem' - I appoint them you know, but I'm very constitutional; the whole world seems rather dumbed down these days and lacking in finesse. The Lady Catherine de Burgh (talk) 17:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC)