This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mboverload (talk | contribs) at 23:16, 18 May 2006 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:16, 18 May 2006 by Mboverload (talk | contribs) (→[])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| < May 17 | > |
|---|
May 18, 2006
Template:Db-notagsupplied
Template:Db-notagsupplied (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Speedy tag created to support a test proposal that did not pass. Stifle (talk) 16:14, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. --StuffOfInterest 18:28, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Template:User chav
Template:User chav (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Userbox is a possible NPOV violation, also might entice vandalism on related user pages. -- Masterjamie 17:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Until/unless a concensus policy is established. --StuffOfInterest 18:28, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. NPOV violation? CTOAGN (talk) 19:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Harmless.--Weatherman1126 (talk) 20:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Template:User notchav
Template:User notchav (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Like the above, userbox is a possible NPOV violation, also might entice vandalism on related user pages. -- Masterjamie 17:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Until/unless a consensus policy is established. --StuffOfInterest 18:28, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. NPOV violation? CTOAGN (talk) 19:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Harmless. --Weatherman1126 (talk) 20:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Keep User boxes are not meant to be neutral as they reflect a persons opinion, don't be so pathetic. PS hurry this up because the outcome is inevitable.--Childzy 21:36, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep the only vandalism I see is you sticking that deletion template in it. --mboverload@ 23:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Template:user not censored
Template:Not censored (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) While Misplaced Pages is not censored for the protection of minors, there are nevertheless restrictions on what, when, and where certain content can be used. Posting pictures of nudity on userpages would normally not be accepted, so why should it be allowed just because it is in a userbox?--Conrad Devonshire 20:39, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Masterjamie 20:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep until WP:MACK or similar procedures work. If you have problems with the image, the classic one is the one used in the revision here. I think the drawing with the censorship bars actually conveys the message better than the breasts do. Kusma (討論) 22:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Conrad hates boobies! --mboverload@ 23:06, 18 May 2006 (UTC)