Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 15:46, 3 March 2013 (Robot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 31d) to User talk:JoshuSasori/Archive 1.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Mariko Ogawa

January 2013

You have been blocked for veiled threats meant to intimidate other editors, disruptive accusations of personal attacks, and for your own actual personal attacks in diffs: . You're failure to substantiate your claims of being hounded at all and insistence that others dig up the evidence for you were not very effective arguments at WP:ANI or WP:DRN.--v/r - TP 17:51, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

As I told you, and as you can find from checking the rules on the DRM page, participants are not supposed to comment on other users' behaviour at DRM. I don't understand why you think I should break that rule. Anyway, I presented you with evidence, and you ignored it, so there is not much more I can do. Bye. JoshuSasori (talk) 23:18, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Josh, you've misunderstood. DRN is meant for content, not user behavior, true. However, ANI is about user behavior, and not content. The discussion on ANI required you to substantiate your claims, which you were told several times. — The Hand That Feeds You: 13:05, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

I explained to the above administrator that the WP:DRM rules require me not to discuss user behaviour. I bent over backwards to follow that rule and not point out that Elvenscout742 had been carrying out a month-long campaign of harassment against me. Yet TParis has repeated that claim above. TParis should apologize to me for impuning my character like that, and for not knowing the rules of DRM, as he perhaps should do if he is an administrator. I also explained on the ANI talk page that the user had initialized the hounding of me by moving pages, and further disruptively editing pages by adding original research claims then creating huge arguments on talk pages. I did indeed give appropriate links at the ANI. The admin above did not respond when I gave details of how the harassment by Elvenscout742 started, despite giving links to the moved pages. Since he twice demonstrated unwillingness to listen, what response am I supposed to make? JoshuSasori (talk) 23:50, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

JoshuSasori, why are you continuing to make bogus accusations of original research against me? I already pointed out the specifics of the Kuroneko case on ANI: I wanted to include a tidbit about the Japanese title, and I cited two sources. You didn't like my sources, so I went and found another one, which you had to accept. I then later added Wikilinks to the names of one historical personage and two historical locations featured in the film, and you took this as "original research" (giving no specific reason), even when I pointed out the existence of FA-level film articles that do the same thing. I have also pointed out numerous times in probably well over a dozen locations that I am not harassing you. If I was only pretending to be interested in editing articles on Japanese cinema in order to annoy you, how do explain the dozens of edits I made to these articles before you registered on Misplaced Pages? The fact is that the past month has been marked by me attempting to edit a number of articles that you just happened to have made one or two minor edits to several months earlier, and you immediately following me to those articles and making numerous edits that block my edits from view. You have never provided evidence of my "harassing" you because none exists; I on the other hand have provided an abundance of evidence that you have been reverting me in bad faith and should remain blocked until you have demonstrated a willingness to collaborate with your fellow Wikipedians. I hope any admin that sees the above as a request to be unblocked takes into account that your request shows a complete unwillingness to admit any wrongdoing, and a readiness to return to the same kind of behaviour as before. I'm sure it's not a good idea if you are seeking to be unblocked to essentially say "I won't apologize; the administrator who blocked me should apologize." elvenscout742 (talk) 13:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Josh, you did not provide any evidence. Linking moved pages is not evidence of a harassment campaign. The fact that you both edit & discuss similar subjects is not evidence of hounding. And you still don't seem to understand: the rules about not discussing behavior at DRN only applies to posts at DRN. Once you got to ANI, you had to discuss user behavior. — The Hand That Feeds You: 14:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Password

The password for the account JoshuSasori is "scorpion.kaji64". JoshuSasori (talk) 01:56, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Not any more, it isn't. Accounts with published passwords are not allowed, so I have changed it. I am not sure what your purpose in publishing your password was, but the only effect has been to make the account inaccessible to you. Another editor who has logged on as JoshuSasori (talk) 09:19, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

AN discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.