Misplaced Pages

User talk:Scientiom

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Scientiom (talk | contribs) at 15:35, 14 March 2013 (done with this collaboration :)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:35, 14 March 2013 by Scientiom (talk | contribs) (done with this collaboration :))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Hello and welcome to my talk page, please click New section to leave me a new message.

Hatnote

I just added a hatnote to the SSM article. Does it address the concerns you mentioed yesterday? Pass a Method talk 18:11, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Just letting you know...

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is User:Little green rosetta reported by User:StillStanding-247 (Result: ). Thank you. —StAnselm (talk) 10:33, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User North8000 disruptive talk page editing at talk:Homophobia. Thank you. - MrX 19:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

I just wanted to drop by to welcome you back. We missed your contributions. Cheers. - MrX 16:14, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Now you made me hungry again - coincidentally I had a strawberry milkshake about 2 hours ago. Heh Heh. :P --Scientiom (talk) 16:22, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Homophobic propaganda rename?

Hi Scientiom, shouldn't this article be renamed to homosexual propaganda? That would be the WP:COMMONNAME after all since we don't call homophobia non-heterosexuality and since this title seems biased to me.
And the lede wouldn't have to change too much to become something like: Homosexual propaganda (or gay propaganda) is a perceived tactic some accuse homosexual and sometimes other non-heterosexual people of using to recruit others and/or gain acceptance.
What do you think? Thanks ツ Jenova20 11:04, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

I believe this article is about anti-LGBT rhetoric? --Scientiom (talk) 11:19, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
No, it's about homophobic propaganda, commonly called homosexual or gay propaganda, not homophobic propaganda. If it's about anti-LGBT rhetoric then it needs a rename anyway or a merge into homophobia. This is the same reason we have a homophobia article instead of an opposition to gay people or non-heterosexual article. This name doesn't strike me as neutral. Do you see what i mean? Thanks ツ Jenova20 11:36, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I've decided to continue adding to my sandbox article. We can always merge later if it's decided they're similar enough. Thanks ツ Jenova20 16:21, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Alright. Good luck with your work on that! :) --Scientiom (talk) 12:59, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
I've ended up at DRN due to a discussion with the IP you reverted here. I'm just letting you know in advance as you might be called up at some stage. I don't know...I don't really like DRN or being called to go there and it's a reason i don't edit controversial stuff as much anymore. Thanks ツ Jenova20 13:41, 14 March 2013 (UTC)