Misplaced Pages

User talk:Second Quantization

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 93.136.16.90 (talk) at 11:28, 29 March 2013 (Biocentrism move proposal). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 11:28, 29 March 2013 by 93.136.16.90 (talk) (Biocentrism move proposal)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Archive 1,2,3,4, 5 /Suggestion Box

Template:Attempting wikibreak

The TM topic

Hi IRWolfie and welcome to the TM topic area. I’ve noticed that you have removed significant amounts of sourced content without discussion or consensus. Being new to the topic area you may be unaware of the TM ArbCom and that the articles in the topic fall under its discretionary sanctions including Peremptory reversion or removal of material referenced to reliable sources and added in good faith by others, is considered disruptive when done to excess. This is particularly true of controversial topics where it may be perceived as confrontational. In light of this you might consider self-reverting the edits below and discussing them on the talk page before removing the material again.

  • In this edit you removed text along with 7 sources.
  • In this edit you removed text and 3 sources.
  • In this edit you removed a large amount of content along with 4 sources.

Thanks for your input and good faith efforts to improve the articles in and around the TM topic. Best,-- — KeithbobTalk17:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

If you wish to discuss the issue, specifically material that violates WP:FRINGE or WP:NOR, address my specific concerns on the talk page. You are also inadvertently misrepresenting the arbcom statement. It is a statement of principles that hold for all of wikipedia and refers to material removed during the initial collaboration process; not material which has been in an article for some time. It also does not indicate that it is a specific sanction in TM, you have misrepresented this.
I am well used to editing fringe articles, I am a WP:FTN regular, and Fringe topics are the bulk of my edits. Thus I have much experience with WP:FRINGE, WP:NOR, WP:RS P&G and its applications. In light of the fact that you provide absolutely no rationale in policy for why I should revert myself I am going to ignore your request. I also suggest if you want to challenge my edits, provide an actual reason; saying my edits are too bold is itself not a valid rationale for a revert Misplaced Pages:BOLD,_revert,_discuss_cycle#What_BRD_is.2C_and_is_not: "BRD is not a valid excuse for reverting good-faith efforts to improve a page simply because you don't like the changes. Don't invoke BRD as your reason for reverting someone else's work or for edit warring: instead, provide a reason that is based on policies, guidelines, or common sense.". Note that fringe topics are themselves under discretionary sanctions Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Discretionary_sanctions. IRWolfie- (talk) 11:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks IRWolfie for your reply. My purpose was to politely inform you of the discretionary sanctions that apply to the TM topic. You may chose to interpret them or respond to them in any way that you like. Best, -- — KeithbobTalk12:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
You did more than that, you made specific claims regarding extra sanctions on TM by ArbCom. The claims were not factually correct. IRWolfie- (talk) 11:19, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Second Quantization. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
Message added 17:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thanks for all your efforts attempting to keep Misplaced Pages neutral. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 05:36, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Cheers, :) IRWolfie- (talk) 20:13, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Maque

Have some respect. Remember I don't know you. I'm a teacher of Physics indeed but for you I'm Prof.Maque.Maque (talk) 07:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Biocentrism move proposal

Seeing your edits there, it seems you might be interested in the biocentrism move proposal. :) 93.136.16.90 (talk) 11:16, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Yep, I'll comment. Don't forget that you are required to notify people in a non-partisan way (per WP:CANVASS). IRWolfie- (talk) 11:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for reminder! I've notified every participant of the last move discussion. 93.136.16.90 (talk) 11:28, 29 March 2013 (UTC)