This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Littleolive oil (talk | contribs) at 22:42, 5 April 2013 (→COI: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:42, 5 April 2013 by Littleolive oil (talk | contribs) (→COI: reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WP:RETENTION
This editor is willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask.
 Archives | ||||||
Index
|
||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
GOCE March drive newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive update
  Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Here's the mid-drive newsletter. Participation: We have had 58 people sign up for this drive so far, which compares favorably with our last drive, and 27 have copy-edited at least one article. If you have signed up but have not yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: Our target of completing the 2010 articles has almost been reached, with only 56 remaining of the 194 we had at the start of the drive. The last ones are always the most difficult, so thank you if you are able to help copy-edit any of the remaining articles. We have reduced the total backlog by 163 articles so far. Special thanks: Special thanks to Stfg, who has been going through the backlog and doing some preliminary vetting of the articles—removing copyright violations, doing initial clean-up, and nominating some for deletion. This work has helped make the drive a more pleasant experience for all our volunteers. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (talk), Stfg (talk), and Dank (talk)To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
GOCE news: February 2013
Guild of Copy Editors Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Blitzes/February 2013 wrap-up
Participation: Out of 19 people who signed up for this blitz, 9 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the six-day blitz, we removed over twenty articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the March drive in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Torchiest, BDD and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:20, 25 February 2013 (UTC) |
T.S. Eliot quote
Hi Olive! I replied to the topic of the recent addition to the Eliot article at Talk:T. S. Eliot. I think it was a good idea to open the addition up to conversation on the Talk page. Best.Jpcohen (talk) 01:53, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
- Good, yes very good to get input on this issue. Thanks for responding.(olive (talk) 17:56, 26 February 2013 (UTC))
Please comment on Misplaced Pages:Op Privilege Policy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Misplaced Pages:Op Privilege Policy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
New User Template
 | This user is a member of the Wiki Project on Transcendental Meditation. |
Hi, I am notifying all editors who are listed as participants at the Transcendental Meditation project page to let them know they may add this newly created project user template (see image at left) to their user page by adding the following code: {{User WPTranscendental Meditation}} to their page, if they so desire. Thanks! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:06, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
GOCE mid-March 2013 newsletter
| Guild of Copy Editors March 2013 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter
We are halfway through our March backlog elimination drive. The mid-drive newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis |
Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Dispute resolution noticeboard
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Dispute resolution noticeboard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| Belated recognition for your dedication to teamwork during the drive to bring John Hagelin to GA status. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 22:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks so much, Kbob. Yes, many editors worked on that article, definitely a group effort.(olive (talk) 18:23, 2 April 2013 (UTC))
GOCE April 2013 newsletter
| Guild of Copy Editors March 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter
We have completed our March backlog elimination drive. The drive wrap-up newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis |
AE Appeal
Hi Olive. I have now lodged my appeal against my banning. Apparently it could not be heard by Arbcom. Cheers. Rumiton (talk) 11:28, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Rumiton. I 'd like to comment, so thanks for the notice.(olive (talk) 15:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC))
GAR
Per WP:GAR I am notifying you of a discussion about a re-assement of the article John Hagelin. IRWolfie- (talk) 21:49, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
COI
Can you please confirm or deny whether you work or have a connection to MUM. This question is in connection primarily with your edits to John Hagelin. IRWolfie- (talk) 22:33, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but where I work or don't is no one 's business. I suggest you review the TG arbitration for further information on the implications of pursuing editors based on making COI connections. (olive (talk) 22:42, 5 April 2013 (UTC))