This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HGJ345 (talk | contribs) at 06:03, 13 April 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:03, 13 April 2013 by HGJ345 (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)16:10, also known as 8:5, is an aspect ratio mostly used for computer displays and tablet computers. The width of the display is 1.6 times its height. This ratio is close to the golden ratio "" which is approximately 1.618.
LCD computer displays using the 16:10 ratio started to appear in the mass market from 2003. By 2008 16:10 had become the most common aspect ratio for LCD monitors and laptop displays. Since 2010, however, 16:9 has become the mainstream standard, driven by the 1080p standard for high definition television.
History
Computer displays
Industry moves towards 16:10 from 2003 to 2008
Until about 2003, most computer monitors had a 4:3 aspect ratio and some had 5:4. Between 2003 and 2006, monitors with 16:10 (8:5) aspect ratios became commonly available, first in laptops and later also in standalone monitors. Reasons for this transition were productive uses for such monitors, i.e. besides widescreen movie viewing and computer game play, are the word processor display of two standard letter pages side by side, as well as CAD displays of large-size drawings and CAD application menus at the same time.
In 2005–2008, 16:10 overtook 4:3 as the most sold aspect ratio for LCD monitors. At the time, 16:10 also had 90% of the notebook market and was the most commonly used aspect ratio for laptops. However, 16:10 had a short reign as the most common aspect ratio.
Industry moves away from 16:10 in 2008 to 16:9
Around 2008–2010, there was a rapid shift by computer display manufacturers to the 16:9 aspect ratio and by 2011 16:10 had almost disappeared from new mass market products. According to Net Applications, by October 2012 the market share of 16:10 displays had dropped to less than 23 percent.
The primary reason for this move was considered to be production efficiency - since display panels for TVs use the 16:9 aspect ratio, it became more efficient for display manufacturers to produce computer display panels in the same aspect ratio as well. A 2008 report by DisplaySearch also cited a number of other reasons, including the ability for PC and monitor manufacturers to expand their product ranges by offering products with wider screens and higher resolutions, helping consumers to adopt such products more easily and "stimulating the growth of the notebook PC and LCD monitor market".
The shift from 16:10 to 16:9 got a negative response from computer enthusiasts. The criticism was mainly focused on the lack of vertical screen real estate when compared to 16:10 displays of the same screen diagonal. For this reason, most enthusiasts considered 16:9 displays less suitable for productivity-oriented tasks, such as editing documents or spreadsheets and using design or engineering applications. PC vendors have replied that the demand for 16:10 displays wasnt enough to maintain its mainstream position and that 16:9 is more cost efficient.
Tablets
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (August 2012) |
Tablets started to enjoy mainstream popularity during the late 2000s. These modern releases are offered in various aspect ratio where 16:10 and 4:3 are the most common.
Common screen resolutions
This is a list of common screen resolutions with the 16:10 aspect ratio.
Name | Dimensions | Diagonal screen size |
---|---|---|
WXGA | 1280×800 | 13–15 in (33–38 cm) |
WXGA+ | 1440×900 | 13–19 in (33–48 cm) |
WSXGA+ | 1680×1050 | 15–22 in (38–56 cm) |
WUXGA | 1920×1200 | 17–28 in (43–71 cm) |
WQXGA | 2560×1600 | 30 in (76 cm) |
See also
- Display aspect ratio - Different aspect ratios for computer monitors.
- Aspect ratio (image)
- Computer display standard
References
- Knight, Dan (2008-09-19). "With 10% of the US Notebook Market, Where Will Apple Go Next?".
- ^ "Product Planners and Marketers Must Act Before 16:9 Panels Replace Mainstream 16:10 Notebook PC and Monitor LCD Panels, New DisplaySearch Topical Report Advises". DisplaySearch. 2008-07-01. Retrieved 2011-09-08.
- ^ Ricker, Thomas (2008-07-02). "Widescreen LCDs going widescreen by 2010". Engadget.
- NEMATech Computer Display Standards http://www.millertech.com/Technical_Specs.htm
- "Introduction--Monitor Technology Guide". necdisplay.com. Archived from the original on 2007-03-15. (currently offline)
- "Screen Resolutions". Net Applications. October 2012. Retrieved 2012-11-26.
- Miller, Michael J. (2008-03-21). "Where Displays Are Heading". PC Magazine. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
- Kowaliski, Cyril (2008-07-02). "DisplaySearch: Transition to 16:9 displays is 'unstoppable'". The Tech Report. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
- Hardforum http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1508064
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
PC Mag
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - "Gateway's 16:10 displays show common sense". The Inquirer. 2010-07-16. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
- Orion, Egan (2010-06-11). "Time to ditch awful HD 1080p widescreens". The Inquirer. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
- Novakovic, Nebojsa (2011-08-26). "Monitor Aspect Ratios — Beyond 16:9, iPad to the rescue?". VR-Zone. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
- http://blog.lenovo.com/perspectives/display-ratio-change-again