Misplaced Pages

talk:Speedy deletions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jesse3 (talk | contribs) at 15:57, 25 May 2006 (This was not a test.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:57, 25 May 2006 by Jesse3 (talk | contribs) (This was not a test.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Misplaced Pages:Advertising as a Speedy Deletion Category

I have created a proposal for a new speedy deletion category. Please read it and comment on it (preferably on its talk page, not here.) Grandmasterka 21:56, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Neologisms as a Speedy Deletion Category

I have also created a proposal for a new speedy deletion category. Feel free to read it and comment on it either here, or on its talk page. J.J.Sagnella dated 22:34, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Question

I see a user creating a lot of pages about the songs of some non-notable band. These are candidates for speedy, right? --waffle iron  18:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Rules for this page

What is the purpose of the "Deletion of Articles" section? Do you need to list pages there to be speedy deleted? —Mets501 22:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Updating through the backlog

I've done some but it's nearly 3.30am and I have to be up for work in the morning! I'll do the rest next time I'm online. -- Francs2000 02:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Done. I've also removed any listings that were placed on this page: listings belong on the main page, not the talk page. -- Francs2000 23:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Tagged for cleanup

The speedy deletions page has been messed up by a few bad edits, and needs some cleanup attention today.

Really, the list of speedy deletions and the policy should be on different pages to avoid problems like this. --John Nagle 17:30, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

This was not a test.

I recenntly set up a page called the Cult of Sephiroth.

Due to a lack of information and a little metaphor to give an example of the sillines of the page itself not the article it is now up for speedy deletion. I have edited it and would like to know if it is OK.

If the problem was th lack of information on its history...The cult is only a day old and as such it lacks much history.