This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Stewiedv (talk | contribs) at 19:18, 23 April 2013 (→April 2013 (cont)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:18, 23 April 2013 by Stewiedv (talk | contribs) (→April 2013 (cont))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | This article is the subject of a request emailed to the Volunteer Response Team (VRT). Issues identified are: Identity confirmed |
April 2013
Hello, Stewiedv. We welcome your contributions to Misplaced Pages, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Vanilla DeVille, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Misplaced Pages article or website of your organization in other articles (see Misplaced Pages:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Misplaced Pages's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Misplaced Pages when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Erpert 07:42, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. The discussion is about the topic Vanilla DeVille. Thank you. Erpert 21:35, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
April 2013 (cont)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Misplaced Pages:COIN. Thank you. Erpert 08:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Misplaced Pages prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing edits, such as the one you made to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Vanilla DeVille, potentially compromise that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. Since you are a new user, I brought up all those policies because I thought it would help you to understand why some of your edits were questionable. Disagreeing with me is one thing, but it doesn't mean you have the right to follow me to every venue on here and then try to talk down on me and repeat long arguments in the hopes of trying to sway people your way. In other words, I'm not the one harassing you. Erpert 18:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
- As I mentioned in the articles for deletion post, I stayed out of that debate until you brought me into it, using my name in an attempt to defend another one of your bad articles. You refuse to let this go, but instead keep posting about it in new places when you don't get the response you want from the community in previous locations. If you want me to stop replying to your inaccurate posts, then stop posting about me. I took responsibility for my actions, and it's time that you did the same. I have never started a conversation about you, but have only responded to your continued posts about me. You are harassing me by continuing to post about me in every venue you can find. Stewiedv (talk) 19:18, 23 April 2013 (UTC)