Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tagremover (talk | contribs) at 11:53, 9 May 2013 (→8031/8051: 1-bit architecture?: Transferred related content to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Electronics, where it belongs). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my user talk page! Personal messages are wonderful and welcome ! For issues with article content, PLEASE use the article's talk page. It is most likely on my watchlist. Just leave a note pointing me there if its urgent. Or use the Template:Talkback: {{Talkback|page}} or {{Tb|page}}. I will respond there. Article discussions here will be often moved to the article's talk page. Thank you very much.

Welcome and I beg a favor

Hi Tagremover! I saw your intro at the Teahouse and . . . I wonder if you can help me out with something? I got involved with trying to help a new Misplaced Pages user named Cchallag save his/her article on PureView Pro. Unfortunately I am utterly non-techie and couldn't rewrite it myself, but it was ultimately saved in his/her userspace: it's now here. Could you possibly help the editor to fix this up so it can be moved back into mainspace, or use the material in it (such as the diagram) to improve the article on the phone that you are working on? I have no idea which would be better - as I say, I am incompetent in the area of knowledge. I'll happily advise on things like how to add the references and how to make the wording neutral, and I'm sure the folks at the Teahouse will too. But it seems to me that the two articles belong together and could benefit from joint effort. Yngvadottir (talk) 00:13, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

The used image is the same as in the Nokia infos, if not fair use, probably copyright violation. The other parts are nothing more than a description, which could be better read in a Nokia info itself (but usually Wiki repeats that). I am trying to bring some additional background info, because its a new, groundbreaking technology in the sensor and the optic.

I saw you are a language genius ! My respect. Tagremover (talk) 01:07, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Heh, hardly a genius, but thanks :-) I suspect Cchallag may be the author of the diagram, or have permission to use it; there is a process for granting official permission that would enable us to continue using it in either case. I did note that he/she had amassed some potential references in that last version of the article (it was restored in user space as it had been right before it was deleted); I hope you can either use them in your article or help Cchallag learn how to use them in that article. Sounds like you think it better just to have the article on the phone? Either way, let me know if I can help; I did get the impression that, as you are saying, this is something genuinely new enough - and that has received enough 3rd-party attention - that it should be covered here. But I stuck that massive template above (I apologize for its size) because I see you are still relatively new and so there are the links to all the policies and procedures in case you need them. Usually I try my hand at rewriting a new article myself, but this hits way too far into my big educational gap. Yngvadottir (talk) 01:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

• The sensor is a new Resolution processing image sensor, which is capable not only to deliver parts of its pixels, but to interpolate its resolution by having its own image processor, highly reducing external processing needs and data rates and image noise when lower resolutions (also at HD-video) are needed. Additionally very high image resolution.
• The optic is a 1-group lens, here a unit focusing lens based on a shiftable fixed-focus lens, additionally an aperture-less lens and consisting of highly stable, cemented all-aspherical lens elements. Simply: Extreme precision.

Also the results even in the Nokia 808 are amazing, this technology has much reserves. Its the future (my guess). Tagremover (talk) 01:50, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Yeaaaah!! Checking out all your awesome edits! Great work Tagremover :) See you on Wiki... Sarah (talk) 22:40, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Oops, I probably should have left you a burger =) But, I hope you like cookies too... Sarah (talk) 22:40, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

I love cookies too. Thats what i eat: Everything with meat, lots of ice-cream (walnut/pecan/caramel), cookies, spicy potato chips, chocolate (especially the white or darkest ones), sometimes wine-gums or something like that and lots of coffee (espresso style) and juice. To compensate some effects, sometimes a vitamin-pill. So, absolutely healthy? With this wonderful diet surely i will stay the fittest and healthiest. ;-) Tagremover (talk) 03:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

LOL. You sound like me! I swear I add the occasional vegetable in there...generally a tomato on a burger though ;-) Sarah (talk) 03:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh no. sometimes corn or peas, thats all. Nearly no green or "light" stuff. And then i have to run, to get rid of all the calories, and sometimes just stop eating. Until now, it works, and probably next year i will run one more marathon. Tagremover (talk) 03:19, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

trademarks

I see I mis-typed my edit summary here. I meant MOS:TM. Cheers. Dicklyon (talk) 06:27, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Its ok, doesn´t matter. I gave up edits on RISC for not wasting my time in edit-wars, but your revert had no reason: My structure was a lot better. Tagremover (talk) 06:31, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

I didn't look at your structure, just your tag removal. Dicklyon (talk) 06:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Then include your few section-tags in my version. Thats your task now. I made my work. Tagremover (talk) 06:34, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiThanks

Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.2.193 (talk) 16:35, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Modest Barnstar
		You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month! 66.87.7.204 (talk) 00:32, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

An award for you

Golden Wiki Award In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.2.10 (talk) 13:19, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

Sorry about that outburst at WP: ANI. Sadaam Insane (talk) 03:55, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Apology accepted, thanks. This crazy anti/pro <> Airbus/Boeing war is disruptive and i think about solutions to decrease its effects. But changing the brain and believes of humans is not quickly possible. But again: Thanks for thinking clearly. Tagremover (talk) 13:35, 19 January 2013 (UTC)