This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Crum375 (talk | contribs) at 00:42, 29 May 2006 (→Reopening). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:42, 29 May 2006 by Crum375 (talk | contribs) (→Reopening)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Reopening
I don't know about the appropriateness of me reverting Tony, as I was involved in the debate, but then he voted on it too, so it's inappropriateness all round, it seems.
I see Splash has also reverted, so I'm going ahead and restarting this debate. It is meant to last for five days, and I see no harm in allowing that to take place. The debate is not at all vitriolic; quite the reverse, in fact, which I'm glad to see. I think we should only close it early if Phil requests it and no one objects. SlimVirgin 00:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- It seemed like a very odd way to close, particularly given that no action approaching a merge (or even a removal of the AfD tag!) was even undertaken. -Splash 00:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry for reverting Splash. I had thought it was vandalism at first then realized who he was. I do think that AfD's should last their full length of given time. --Strothra 00:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. I think this is very inappropriate. First, I think that admins who vote should not close, revert or otherwise use their admin powers on a given AfD. Also, when if re-opened, it should include a paste of all previous discussion. Crum375 00:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC)