Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 117.196.49.122 (talk) at 18:08, 6 June 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Prashant Bhushan (Template:Lang-hi) (born 1956) is an advocate practising in the Supreme Court of India in Delhi and a social activist. He has been involved in many Public Interest Litigation cases and is a senior member of "Team Anna", which supports Anna Hazare in his anti-corruption campaign. He has drawn controversy over various statements, including accusing chief judges of corruption and supporting a plebiscite for Kashmir separatists.

Birth and education

Prashant is the son of Shanti Bhushan, who was union minister for law in the government of Morarji Desai between 1977 and 1979. Bhushan dropped out of studying electrical engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology Madras after a semester. He then studied first economics and then philosophy of science at Princeton University but left before graduating and returned to India where he received a law degree from Allahabad University.

Career

Prashant Bhushan began practising as an advocate in the Supreme Court of India in 1983, specialising in Public Interest Litigation. His main areas of interest have been Human Rights, the Environment and ensuring that public servants are accountable. He is associated with various organisations including the Centre for Public Interest Litigation, People's Union for Civil Liberties, Committee on Judicial Accountability and Transparency International (India). As of 2012 Bhushan was the convenor of the Working Committee of the Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Judicial Reforms.

Centre for Public Interest Litigation

Bhushan has acted as an advocate for the Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) on several occasions. In October 1997 the Delhi High Court heard a CPIL petition over the award of contracts to Enron and Reliance Industries to develop the Panna-Mukta oilfield, and issued notices to the involved companies and government organisations. Prashant Bhushan acted as advocate for CPIL. The petition claimed an inquiry was justified on the basis of testimony that Reliance had bribed the minister of petroleum, Satish Sharma, to get the award. The CPIL won a major victory in 2003 when the Supreme Court restrained the Central government from privatising Hindustan Petroleum and Bharat Petroleum without the approval of Parliament. As counsel for the CPIL, Rajinder Sachar and Bhushan argued that the only way to disinvest in the companies would be to repeal or amend the Acts by which they were nationalised in the 1970s. As a result, the government would need a majority in both houses to push through any privatisation.

Shanti and Prashant Bhushan were council for the CPIL seeking a direction from the Supreme Court that Dalits who had converted to Christianity should be entitled to the same reservation they had enjoyed as members of Scheduled Castes. The Union government said this was purely a legislative matter, but in February 2005 the Supreme Court decided to again review the constitutional issue. In February 2005 Bhushan and Anil B. Divan were counsel for CPIL seeking quashing of the CVC Act, 2003, which requires the CBI to obtain permission from the Union government before registering corruption cases against senior bureaucrats. Bhushan argued that the act violated the basic rights of citizens and was counter to the rule of law. The Supreme Court referred the question to a constitution bench of five judges.

Bhushan represented the CPIL in a petition asking for the removal of Neera Yadav from office as Chief Secretary of Uttar Pradesh for alleged corruption. Yadav had been named in five CBI corruption cases and 23 departmental proceedings. In October 2005 the Supreme Court directed the Mulayam Singh state government to remove her from her position. Yadav managed to stall her prosecution, but in December 2006 the Supreme Court removed all obstacles to her trial. The case became the first in which an IAS officer of Uttar Pradesh was convicted of corruption.

In 2006 Bhushan represented the CPIL in a petition alleging that Pepsico and Coca-Cola were failing to warn the public of harmful ingredients in their beverages, and were luring young children through misleading advertising. In 2007, Bhushan filed a petition on behalf of the CPIL with the Delhi High Court to investigate whether there had been kickbacks in the 2005 Scorpene submarine deal. The High Court took a strong line with the investigating agency, saying "We feel dissatisfied with that you've done so far. If you've tried to shield someone, then we will come down very heavily on you".

Prashant Bhushan acted for the CPIL when it took the lead in filing a suit against the Government of India for irregularities in a major award of spectrum for 2G mobile telephones. The CPIL petition alleged that the government had lost $15.53 billion by issuing spectrum in 2008 based on 2001 prices, and by not following a competitive bidding process. In September 2011 Bhushan presented evidence that appeared to disprove the claim by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) that Dayanidhi Maran, the former telecom minister, had not applied undue pressure to the owner of Aircel to sell to the Maxis group of Malaysia. Bhushan said the CBI's investigation had been "less than honest". In January 2012 Bhushan questioned why the CBI had failed to lay charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act against companies such as Essar Group and Loop Mobile despite strong evidence against them. In February 2012 the Supreme Court declared the allocation of spectrum had been illegal.

Team Anna

On 30 January 2011 there were "India against Corruption" marches across the country to demand a strong Independent Commission Against Corruption by passing the Jan Lokpal Bill for independent oversight of politicians and bureaucrats. Prashant Bhushan and his father Shanti Bhushan were among the marchers in Delhi. Others prominent protesters included Kiran Bedi, Arvind Kejriwal, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, Swami Agnivesh, Maulana Mahmood Madani, Vincent Conçessao, Aruna Roy and Harsh Mander. At another anti-corruption rally on 26 February 2011 the activist Anna Hazare said he would start an indefinite fast on 5 April unless decisive action was taken on the Lokpal Bill. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh invited Hazare, Swami Agnivesh, Prashant and Shanti Bhushan and Kiran Bedi to meet with him on 7 March. Anna Hazare nominated Prashant Bhushan and his father Shanti as civil society members of the joint committee constituted in April 2011 to draft the Lokpal Bill. Other civil society members were Hazare himself, Karnataka Lokayukta (ombudsman) N. Santosh Hegde and Arvind Kejriwal. All these members decided to declare their assets.

In May 2011 Bhushan said "The basic idea of an empowered Lokpal is that it will have full autonomy, independence from the government, power to investigate complaints of corruption and prosecute all public servants, among other. This principle is non-negotiable". He said that only the details were open for discussion. The Team Anna "Jan Lokpal Bill" had eleven members accountable to the Supreme Court, and supervised by complaint authorities. The Central Bureau of Investigation anti-corruption unit would report to the Jan Lokpal, thus maintaining independence from the government in investigations. Later in May Bhushan and fellow civil-society member Arvind Kejriwal said the government was breaking its word by saying the Lokpal should not be able to investigate the Prime Minister. The government was also against letting the Lokpal investigate senior judges, defence services and the conduct of MPs within parliament. The only scope for Lokpal investigations would be corruption by MPs outside parliament, and a small number of senior civil servants. At this point a breakdown in the talks seemed inevitable.

In June 2011 Bhushan pointed out that key proposals made by Team Anna had been omitted from the latest government draft. These included the power to tap telephones and to recommend that public authorities change their work practices to make corruption less likely and to prevent victimisation of whistle blowers. Lokpal should also be able to recommend cancellation of contracts and blacklisting of firms or people involved in corrupt practices. The CBI anti-corruption wing should come under Lokpal and be independent of the central government.

That month Baba Ramdev began an "indefinite fast against corruption". Bhushan criticised Ramdev's decision to share his platform with leaders from the Hindutva organisations Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Vishwa Hindu Parishad.

On 4 August 2011 the government's version of the Lokpal bill was tabled in the Lok Sabha. Bhushan said the government's draft should be called the "Promotion of Corruption Bill 2011" or the "Protection of Corrupt Public Servants Bill 2011". He said the bill was designed to protect the corrupt and to deter complaints. On 10 August Bhushan said Team Anna demanded that this version be withdrawn. He said: "We are going to put forward our views, that how the Bill prepared by the government will encourage corruption instead of curbing it and will provide protection to the corrupt officials".

Following Hazare's detention for staging a demonstration, on 16 August 2011 Prashant Bhushan said that peaceful protests had been arranged across the country. He said the Delhi police had detained Hazare at the bidding of the cabinet: "There is no freedom for Delhi Police. It has become a puppet, an ornament in the hands of Central government". Later that month Anna Hazare began a hunger strike. Bhushan said the government could not postpone passing a proper Lokpal bill indefinitely. He reported that Anna Hazare had said he would fast until Hazare's draft Lokpal bill was introduced into parliament and passed, or that he would fast until death. On 28 August Hazare called off his fast. Two days later it was announced that Arvind Kejriwal and Prashant Bhushan would have an informal meeting with Abhishek Singhvi, chairman of the parliamentary Standing Committee on Law and Justice to discuss how the committee would proceed in reconciling the various draft anti-corruption laws, which could take several months.

In September 2011 Bhushan criticised the proposed National Judicial Oversight Committee. He said that inclusion of "brother judges" in the committee would prevent it acting impartially, and including two MPs in the committee would compromise judicial independence. Team Anna had proposed a 5-person committee independent of both the executive and the judiciary. In January 2012 Bhushan said in a press conference that Team Anna was working on a draft amendment to the constitution that would ensure the people had more say in the framing of laws. Bhushan and Hazare both opposed the Lokpal bill that was eventually introduced by the government, saying in February 2012 that it was very weak.

Other cases

Bhushan has acted on a wide variety of high-profile cases. In 1992 he initiated a petition in the high court of Karantaka alleging bribery in the Mangalore Power Company project. After seven years, this was eventually dismissed. In 1998, as counsel for Arun Kumar Aggarwal, he initiated a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) against the Union Government of India and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for retaining SEBI chairman D.R. Mehta after his three-year term had expired. Prashant Bhushan and Nitya Ramakrishnan were appointed counsel for the four people accused of the attack on parliament on 13 December 2001. The four were found guilty on 16 December 2002.

Bhushan assisted the Narmada Bachao Andolan activists opposed to the Sardar Sarovar Dam. After six years of hearings, in October 2000 the Supreme court ruled to allow the massive project to recommence. Bhushan criticised the decision for having been made "without any evidence of the facts before the judges". Bhushan defended novellist Arundhati Roy when she was charged with contempt of court for publicly criticising judges in the dam hearings. In March 2002 she was sentenced to one day in jail. According to Bhushan the judges were "just affronted by the fact that somebody has dared to criticise them". In April 2002 a constitutional bench ruled that the decisions of the Supreme Court could not be assailed, but someone who felt they had suffered a gross miscarriage' of justice could move a "curative" petition. Bhushan described this ruling as retrograde – a step backward.

In 2003 Bhushan filed a petition against Akhand Pratap Singh, chief secretary of the Uttar Pradesh state government, challenging a decision to extend his tenure. The petition alleged that Singh had been voted "most corrupt officer" in 1997 by the UP IAS Officers Association. The state government had ignored requests to allow a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into graft charges. In November 2003 the petition was refused. In July 2005 Bhushan was a member of an independent panel investigating a possible scam involving a company that made a huge profit buying and reselling Mumbai Airport Centaur Hotel and the son in law of former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee. In September 2005 Bhushan represented Common Cause, a social organisation, seeking to reopen the petrol-pump scam case against Satish Sharma, a former minister of petroleum in the Union government.

In February 2006, as counsel for Lok Sevak Sangh, Bhushan submitted to the Supreme Court that the MP Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS) might not be constitutionally valid. A TV channel had recently aired video of a sting in which it appeared that some MPs had taken bribes under the scheme. Bhushan said none of the normal controls were being applied, and the scheme was breeding corruption.

Some other widely discussed cases in which he has appeared relate to the Bofors scandal, disposal of the Dabhol Power Station after the Enron bankruptcy, Doon Valley Mining litigation, Right to Information Act and Mauritius Double Taxation. He appeared in a controversial case in which candidates for election to public office were required to disclose their assets and any criminal convictions.

Controversy and criticism

Bhushan has often been involved in controversy. He has been criticised by a variety of people including members of both the Indian National Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

Judicial corruption allegations

Prashant Bhushan mounted a persistent campaign against judicial immunity, and this influenced the decision in September 2009 that judges would declare their assets. Not long after, Bhushan asserted in an interview published by Tehelka magazine that "half of the last 16 Chief Justices have been corrupt". A lawyer filed a charge of contempt of court against Bhushan and the editor of the magazine. In October 2010 Prashant Bhushan and his father Shanti Bhushan both filed formal affidavits alleging that eight retired chief justices were corrupt. They noted the difficulty of getting documentary evidence because judges are immune from investigation. Justice Krishna Iyer, a former supreme court judge, said that either Shanti Bhushan and Prashant Bhushan should be punished for making "false charges" or an independent authority should scrutinise their allegations.

Kashmir plebiscite remarks

On 26 September 2011 Bhushan was asked for his opinion on Kashmir at a press conference in Varanasi. He said: "It is my personal opinion that no country or part of its territory can be governed without the wishes of the people with the help of army...I want that the situation be normalised, Army be withdrawn, the Armed Forces Special Powers Act be also withdrawn and then try to persuade the people of Kashmir to stay with India. And yet, if the people want, then there could be a plebiscite, and if the people of the Valley want separation, they be allowed to separate".

On 12 October 2011, Bhushan was attacked and beaten up because of this statement. The incident happened while a Times Now news channel team was interviewing Bhushan. Three youths entered his chamber in the Supreme Court, dragged him from his chair, slapped and punched him. Two escaped. The third claimed to belong to an organisation called "Bhagat Singh Kranti Sena". He said: "We will break the heads of those who will try to break India". The incident was captured by the television crew.

Bhagat Singh Kranti Sena claimed responsibility for the attack. Six hours before the attack, the group had posted on Facebook: "God give us power to complete our mission." In a Facebook post afterwards they wrote "we hit prashant bhushan hard in his chamber in supreme court.if u will try to break my nation,i will break ur heads." [sic] P. Chidambaram, the Home Minister, condemned the attack. He dispatched a representative to the hospital where Bhushan had been taken for a check-up. Digvijaya Singh, General Secretary of Congress, said one of the attackers was a BJP youth worker, a charge that was immediately denied by the BJP. Bhushan described the activists as having a "fascist mindset" and stood by his statements.

The Shiv Sena called for Bhushan to be tried for his statements about Kashmir. Bal Thackeray, the leader of Shiv Sena, said "I praised the people who attacked him. No mercy should be shown to the people who advocate the division of the country". It was reported on 19 October 2011 that a court in Varanasi had accepted a complaint against Prashant Bhushan requesting a treason case. Anna Hazare said "Bhushan's statement (on Kashmir) is not the views of the team. He has never asked the team. These are his personal views". Hazare said "Our core committee will meet to decide on his continuing as a team member. After it meets. I will take a decision". In the event, Bhushan remained part of the team. In April 2012 Bhushan said that while Team Anna supported Raj Thackeray's initiative to subject party candidates for election to examinations, they did not support Thackeray's political views.

Other controversy

In February 2001 a criminal petition was filed with the Supreme Court of India accusing Medha Patkar, Prashant Bhushan and Arundhati Roy of contempt of court for having demonstrated in front of the Supreme court in protest against the judgement on the Sardar Sarovar Dam. During an interview with a former police office, the anchorperson of the Times Now TV channel turned to the camera and said: "Arundhati Roy and Prashant Bhushan, I hope you are watching this. We think you are disgusting".

On 2 February 2010 the BJP government of Himachal Pradesh granted Prashant Bhushan's "Kumud Bhushan Educational Society" permission to buy 4.68 hectares (11.6 acres) of land in order to build an educational institution. The sale was controversial because only the state government can give permission for sale or change of status of tea garden land. Union minister Virbhadra Singh charged that the sale was illegal. However, Chief Minister Prem Kumar Dhumal rejected these charges in February 2012, defending the grant of relaxations to the educational trust, and countered that the Congress government had been giving land to Tibetans that belonged to Himachal Pradesh. Bhushan had put up two buildings on the site and was using them to run workshops on policy awareness. He said that the plantation was in disuse and most of the bushes had died, but he had planted new bushes.

The Bharatiya Janata Party criticised Anna Hazare's nomination of the Bhushans to the Lokpal committee. Guru Baba Ramdev also criticised inclusion of both father and son, calling it nepotism. Hazare defended the choice on the basis of the experience and ability of the two Bhushans. Soon after the committee began work, a CD was released that appeared to be a recording of conversation between Bhushan's father and Amar Singh of the Samajwadi Party related to the 2G case that was being heard at the time. If genuine, the CD would discredit Shanti Bhushan. Prashant Bhushan stated that labs had shown the CD was doctored. He and Anna Hazare said its purpose seemed to be to stop or delay both the 2G hearings and the Lokpal committee. Later Singh claimed in a press conference that Bhushan telephoned him and tried to stop him from talking.

On 15 April 2011 Congress leader Digvijay Singh alleged that the two Bhushans had failed to pay taxes due when they bought an investment property in Allahabad. Bhushan denied the charge, calling it a "very organised and concerted attempt to smear members of the civil society in the drafting committee with allegations". On 9 January 2012 it was reported that Shanti Bhushan had been found guilty of evading stamp duty on the home he had bought in Allahabad. The Assistant of Stamp Duty in Allahabad said the property, which Shanti Bhushan had bought in 1965, had been grossly undervalued, as had the related taxes. Revised stamp duty, interest on arrears and a fine would be levied. Shanti Bhushan said ""This order of the Stamp Collector is totally illegal and contrary to the law ... This order has been clearly made under political pressure".

In September 2011 Bhushan, Arvind Kejriwal and Kiran Bedi were being threatened with charges of breach of privilege for making derogatory remarks about MPs. Bhushan urged MPs to not be so sensitive to criticism, saying the law of defamation gave them enough protection. Attempts to use their privileges to suppress free speech and crticism would backfire by making people feel there was a serious problem in the way that parliament was functioning.

In February 2012 Bhushan surprised commentators by coming out in favour of the government's proposed National Counter Terrorism Council. In April 2012 Bhushan drew criticism from Congress leaders when he refused to act as a mediator in negotiating with Maoists who were holding a District Collector hostage. He called for the Maoists to release the officer without conditions. He also said that the government should investigate and address legitimate demands.

Bibliography

• Prashant Bhushan (1978). The case that shook India. Vikas Pub. House. p. 294. ISBN 0-7069-0594-6.
• Prashant Bhushan (1990). Bofors, the selling of a nation. Vision Books. p. 275. ISBN 81-7094-066-4.

References

1. VIJAY SIMHA (6 September 2008). "The House Of Bhushan". Tehelka Magazine. 5 (35). Retrieved 26 April 2012.
2. ^ "Legal Luminaires – Prashant Bhushan". Unilawonline. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
3. "Working Committee". Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Judicial Reforms. Retrieved 30 April 2012.
4. "Notices to Centre, CAG, Enron, Reliance on Panna-Mukta oilfield". Rediff. 14 October 1997. Retrieved 30 April 2012.
5. SAMANWAYA RAUTRAY AND PHEROZE L. VINCENT (4 March 2011). "Feather in cap for graft fighters". The Telegraph. Retrieved 26 April 2012.
6. Ramakrishna, G. V. (2004). Two Score and Ten: My Experiences in Government. Academic Foundation. p. 301. ISBN 81-7188-339-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
7. Gopal Ganesh (2008). Privatisation And Labour Restructuring. Academic Foundation. p. 136. ISBN 81-7188-634-5.
8. "SC to examine quota for Dalit Christians". Times of India. 12 February 2005. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
9. RAKESH BHATNAGAR (4 February 2005). "SC refers to a constitution bench". The Times of India. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
10. Rakesh Bhatnagar (6 October 2005). "Mulayam honours SC verdict, Neera Yadav goes". DNA. Retrieved -2012-04-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
11. Pervez Iqbal Siddiqui (8 December 2006). "Neera Yadav may find herself in trouble". Times of India. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
12. "Those who make the grade". Tehelka. 11 May 2005. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
13. "Court to hear cola case after 6 weeks". Times of India. 5 August 2006. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
14. Saikat Datta (21 January 2008). "A Sea of Subterfuge". Outlook. 48 (3). Retrieved 26 April 2012.
15. Hui Pan, ed. (October 2010). "ED tells SC that 2G spectrum scam probe is underway". India Telecom Monthly Newsletter. Information Gatekeepers Inc: 6.
16. "2G scam: NGO to counter CBI on Maran". Times of India. 7 September 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
17. "2G scam: SC seeks CBI, ED response on charges they are soft". The Indian Express. 5 January 2012. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
18. "Dr. Subramanian Swamy ...Petitioner versus Union of India and others ...Respondents". Keralaw. 2 February 2012. Retrieved 26 April 2012.
19. "Activists to march against corruption". Times of India. 28 January 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
20. "Activists to meet PM on Lokpal Bill". sify News. 6 March 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
21. ^ "BJP slams Anna over inclusion of Bhushan father-son in panel". The Indian Express. 11 April 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
22. "Anna Hazare, associates to declare assets". Samay Live. 15 April 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
23. "Basic principles of Lokpal Bill not negotiable, says Prashant Bhushan". Sify News. 23 May 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
24. ^ "Proposed Lokpal Bill shields corrupt: Bhushan". Express News Service. 8 August 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
25. K. BALCHAND (31 May 2011). "Government going back on its word: Kejriwal". The Hindu. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
26. "Jan Lokpal Bill panel headed for a breakdown?". NDTV. 30 May 2011. {{cite web}}: Text "accessdate-2012-04-28" ignored (help)
27. "Lokpal: key proposals made by Hazare team missing from govt. draft". The Hindu. 22 June 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
28. RAKTIMA BOSE (5 June 2011). "RSS, VHP presence at fast venue irks Prashant Bhushan". The Hindu. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
29. ^ "Govt. should withdraw its Lokpal Bill: Prashant Bhushan". News Track India. 10 August 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
30. "Cabinet ministers taking decisions on Hazare's protest: Prashant Bhushan". Economic Times. India. 16 August 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
31. "Anna Hazare will fast till death: Prashant Bhushan". NewsX. 20 August 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
32. Himanshi Dhawan (30 August 2011). "Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan to meet Singhvi today". The Times of India. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
33. "Bring the higher judiciary under Lokpal: Team Anna". IBN Live. 12 September 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
34. "Now, Team Anna demands people's participation in framing laws". One India News. 23 January 2012. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
35. ^ "Team Anna's Prashant Bhushan backs Congress on 'anti-terror law'". The Indian Express. 27 February 2012. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
36. Vivian Fernandes (15 December 1999). "Impatient Cogentrix jumped the gun by four days after seven-year wait". The Indian Express. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
37. "HC serves show notice on Sebi, centre over Mehta's tenure". The Indian Express. 11 September 1998. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
38. "December 13 beamed after court nod". The Telegraph. 14 December 2002. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
39. Anjali Mody (17 December 2002). "4 accused in Parliament attack case convicted". The Hindu. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
40. PETER POPHAM (22 October 2000). "Arundhati Roy furious at dam decision". The Independent. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
41. Vanessa Gezari (7 March 2002). "Top court jails defiant activist in India; Acclaimed novelist fights dam project". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
42. "SC orders cannot be assailed under Article 32". The Times of India. 10 April 2002. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
43. "CS gets extension, SC issues notice". Times of India. 1 November 2003. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
44. "Panel seeks CBI probe into Ranjan Bhattacharya's 'links' in Centaur deal". Outlook India. 27 July 2005. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
45. "Pump scam cloud on former minister". The Telegraph. 6 September 2005. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
46. "MPLADS comes under judicial scrutiny". Outlook India. 16 February 2006. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
47. "Chief Injustices – Excerpts from a milestone affidavit –". Tehelka. 2 October 2010. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
48. Kuldip Nayar. "Judiciary on Trial". Dawn, Pakistan. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
49. "Prashant Bhushan Had Called For Plebiscite In Kashmir". India TV. 12 October 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
50. "Bhagat Singh Kranti Sena, the sick bunch that 'attacked' Prashant Bhushan". DNA India. 12 October 2011. Retrieved 26 April 2012.
51. DEVESH K. PANDEY (12 October 2011). "Goons attack Prashant Bhushan in chamber". The Hindu. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
52. "Prashant Bhushan beaten up inside his chamber". IBTL. 12 October 2011. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
53. "Prashant Bhushan Beaten Up Inside SC Chamber Over Kashmir Remark". India TV News. 12 October 2011. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
54. "Three attack Prashant Bhushan for Kashmir remarks". IBN Live. 12 October 2011. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
55. "Prashant Bhushan attacked in SC Chambers". First Post. 12 October 2011. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
56. "Prashant Bhushan beaten up; attackers justify 'brutal' act". One India News. 12 October 2011. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
57. "Activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan attacked at his chambers in Supreme Court". NDTV. 13 October 2011. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
58. Rajdeep Sardesai (13 October 2011). "My views on Kashmir not seditious, says Bhushan". CNN-IBN. Retrieved 26 April 2012.
59. "Register case against Bhushan for comment on Kashmir: Shiv Sena". DNA. 13 October 2011. Retrieved 26 April 2012.
60. "Thackerays defend attack on Prashant Bhushan". The Indian Express. 18 October 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
61. "Court accepts complaint against Prashant Bhushan". Times of India. 19 October 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
62. "Team Anna distances itself from Prashant Bhushan's comments on Kashmir". The Times of India. 14 October 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
63. "Rift in Team Anna Hazare on Prashant Bhushan, members dimayed at flip-flop". The Economic Times. India. 16 October 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
64. "'Team Anna doesn't support Raj Thackeray's politics'". Hindustan Times. 27 April 2012. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
65. Arundhati Roy (2001). Power Politics. South End Press. p. 87. ISBN 0-89608-668-2.
66. Arundhati Roy (22 December 2008). "9 is Not 11 (And November isn't September)". Outlook India. 48 (51): 44. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
67. "Dhumal defends land transfer to Bhushan trust". Zee News. 27 February 2012. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
68. "Prashant Bhushan's society bought tea garden land". The Tribune. Dharamsala: Tribune News Service. 23 December 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
69. "Land transferred to Bhushan's trust, admits Dhumal, reminds Virbhadra of Tibetans". The Indian Express. Chandigarh. 24 February 2012. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
70. CHANDER SUTA DOGRA (23 April 2012). "We Are The Higher-Ups". Outlook India. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
71. "Cracks in civil society over inclusion of father-son duo". DNA. 9 April 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
72. Gargi Parsai (18 April 2011). "CD is doctored: Prashant Bhushan". The Hindu. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
73. GARGI PARSAI (6 May 2011). "Prashant denies telephoning Amar Singh to 'gag' him". The Hindu. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
74. "Prashant Bhushan refutes Digvijay Singh's stamp duty evasion charge". Sify News. 15 April 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2012.
75. Anant Zanane (9 January 2012). "Team Anna's Shanti Bhushan found guilty of evading 1.3 crores of property taxes". NDTV. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
76. "Do Not be Sensitive to Criticism: Bhushan to MPs". Outlook. 13 September 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
77. "Renuka Chaudhary slams Prashant Bhushan for refusing to mediate for releasing abducted collector". News Track India. 24 April 2012. Retrieved 28 April 2012.

External links

• "Conversation with Prashant Bhushan". Bar & Bench. 25 October 2010. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
• V. VENKATESAN (14–27 August 2010). "No one wants independent investigation". Frontline. 27 (17). Retrieved 27 April 2012.
• SHOMA CHAUDHURY (5 September 2009). "Half Of The Last 16 Chief Justices Were Corrupt". Tehelka. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
• Vikram Jit Singh (24 November 2006). "We have had many corrupt CJIs in the last 15 years". Tehelka. Retrieved 27 April 2012.

Template:Persondata

• Use dmy dates from November 2012
• Indian lawyers
• Indian activists
• Living people
• Allahabad University alumni
• 1956 births
• Aam Aadmi Party politicians