Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment | User conduct

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Obiwankenobi (talk | contribs) at 15:44, 7 June 2013 (try search box). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:44, 7 June 2013 by Obiwankenobi (talk | contribs) (try search box)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Archives

This page is for archiving user conduct disputes listed on Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Archived disputes should not be added to. Disputes should be archived under any of the following circumstances:

  1. If no additional complaints are registered for an extended period of time, and the dispute appears to have stopped.
  2. The parties to the dispute agree.
  3. The dispute proceeds to another method of dispute resolution, such as mediation or arbitration.

If the dispute is handled in mediation or arbitration, please make a note of where the dispute resolution process continued.

Archived disputes

  • Newer entries towards the top
  • This page only displays user RFCs from the most recent year and the current year, older discussions can be found in the archives, a search box is provided above
  • As of March 25, 2013, the names of the certifiers are no longer a required field. You can find this information easily by clicking the link to the RFC itself.
Name Start date Description Notes
Jax 0677 29 March 2013 Problematic creation of navboxes and other content some progress, later apparenrlty reversed. a proposal for a formal topic ban is anticipated
Arzel 13 May 2013 Talk page and behavioral issues Withdrawn after discussion on talk page of RfC/U
Will Beback 23 March 2013 To discuss whether Will should be allowed back to edit No consensus to overturn Arbcom decision
Apostle12 21 December 2012 Soapboxing, personal attacks, unreliable sources, canvassing Closed due to inactivity
CartoonDiablo 20 January 2013 Tendentious editing/POV issues All participants other than the certifiers felt that this dispute was about content, not conduct


Name Start date Description First two certifiers Notes
Cantaloupe2 31 January 2013 Concerns about civility, battlegrounding, and related conduct issues AndrewDressel, CorporateM Serious and valid problems with Cantaloupe2's conduct exist. The matter might be taken up by ArbCom.
Epeefleche 15 January 2013 Removal of unsourced content from articles Danjel, Graham87 Epeefleche is broadly correct to remove unsourced content, and Danjel has often acted wrongly in restoring unsourced content.
Also, Danjel's conduct is widely seen as hounding.
Morriswa 29 December 2012 Mass edits at high speed, improper use of rollback, deficient listening skills Rschen7754, Imzadi1979 Broad consensus that Morriswa's work was indeed problematic, a problem now recognized by Morriswa. Good will and good faith all around, fortunately.
Johnpacklambert 12 December 2012 excessive editing of the category namespace Purplebackpack89, Ephebi No users endorsed the certifier's position, only statements critical of the certifiers and the process received significant support.
Rhode Island Red 2 21 November 2012 Civility, misuse of edit summaries, sopaboxing, biting the newcomers GeorgeLouis, Collect No consensus, closing admin suggested taking larger issues to arbitration
Bluerim 29 November 2012 Civility, edit warring, consensus Sjones23, JDC808 Closed due to inactivity; Bluerim's last edit was two months before closure
Niemti 01 November 2012 Incivility, ownership, Good articles, lack of edit summaries, Anita Sarkeesian article Bridies, GamerPro64 Topic ban from Anita Sarkeesian at ANI
Apteva 30 November 2012 Concerns strongly asserted opinions about en dashes and the Manual of Style, and allegations of disruption Dicklyon, SMcCandlish Taken to WP:AN for action (diff; closing summary).
Darkstar1st 19 November 2012‎ To determine whether editor fails to "get the point" in discussions about article content. R-41, Kierzek Closed a second time. RfC/U of limited scope concluded there were behavioral problems.
RidjalA 3 November 2012 Concerns regarding possible personal attacks, Possible ownership, and disruptive behavior as a result of bias against the LDM church. Fordx12, Ajaxfiore Delisted due to inactivity
Paul Bedson 3 December 2012 Lack of compliance with verifiability and sourcing policies and guidelines, and original research. Mike Christie, Ealdgyth Unanimous consensus that the problems identified in the RfC exist. Paul Bedson was indefinitely blocked.
SchuminWeb 3 December 2012 Accountability for Administrative Actions Ironholds, GiantSnowman Several highly endorsed viewpoints. Referred to Arbitration.
HiLo48 30 October 2012 Civility, Use of offensive language Surturz, Skyring no consensus achieved.
Mmarque 19 October 2012 Personal attacks on several users Joel B. Lewis, ArthurPSmith no consensus due achieved.
Wikiwatcher1 6 August 2012 Copyright verification, disruption Moonriddengirl, We hope no consensus due to lack of community input
Kurmaa 24 August 2012 Disruptive interactions at talk pages Aeusoes1, Chaipau User indef blocked for sockpuppetry
Bittergrey 28 July 2012 Battleground mentality, COI/activism, off-wiki harassment of an editor WLU, Saedon Suspended due to Bittergrey being blocked for disruption on 30 July 2012
Offender9000 25 June 2012 Outing, violations of neutrality/weight and battleground-like conduct Daveosaurus, Stuartyeates No consensus achieved
Youreallycan 5 August 2012 Edit warring and personal attack Prioryman, Magog the Ogre Agreement. One month break followed by 3 month BLP restriction and 6 month 1RR and civility parole
Agent00f 12 May 2012 Talk page disruption Hasteur No consensus achieved.
TenPoundHammer 7 March 2012 Article deletion nominations Andy Dingley, Ruud Koot User offered to be more in line with community consensus
Vision Thing 20 March 2012 Biased editing Hipocrite, Lawrencekhoo Delisted due to inactivity
TBrandley 29 February 2012 Excessive article creation, disruption Logical Cowboy, JayJay Closed due to editor indef blocked
Kolins 10 January 2012 Potential editing against consensus and lack of discussion on talk pages. GiantSnowman, Drmies Closed after expiring without any response from Kolins
25 January 2012 Various Delicious carbuncle, Aaron Brenneman No consensus was reached
DocKino 14 January 2012 alleged persistently uncivil edit summaries Mmyers1976, Dolphin DocKino has acknowledged that editing Misplaced Pages with frustration and anger is not conductive to a collaborative editing environment and will endeavor to refrain from said commentary in the future.
Categories: