This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Guy Macon (talk | contribs) at 12:50, 8 June 2013 (→Wrong numbers?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:50, 8 June 2013 by Guy Macon (talk | contribs) (→Wrong numbers?: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Raspberry Pi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The article Raspbian was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 December 2012 with a consensus to merge the content into Raspberry Pi. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page. Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Raspberry Pi. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Raspberry Pi at the Reference desk. |
Computing C‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
The following Misplaced Pages contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Archives | ||||||
|
||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Nomination of Raspbian for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raspbian is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Raspbian until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
Edit request on 10 May 2013
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the memory on the Model A to 512MB as it now has the same memory as the Model B. 50.43.89.24 (talk) 23:33, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not done The model A still has 256MB of RAM, not 512MB! Originally the model A was planned to have 128MB of RAM but by the time of the actual launch the RPF managed to increased it to 256MB.
- So unless you have a source that proofs that the model A now has 512MB the current information is still correct. Mahjongg (talk) 00:54, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not done: per Mahjongg, (change the
|answered=
parameter to yes next time). Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:27, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not done: per Mahjongg, (change the
Edit request on 20 May 2013
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Raspberry Pi Camera has just been released. Please update! Nagol68 (talk) 20:27, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —KuyaBriBri 21:15, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Done Mahjongg (talk) 15:24, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Wayland (and Weston), X successor on Pi
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTM3NzM http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTM3NzI
Useable right now(?) from source or when: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTM2MTM
Comp.arch (talk) 16:54, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Wrong numbers?
The articles currently says:
In the highest ("turbo") preset the SDRAM clock was originally 500 MHz, but this was later changed from to 600 Mhz because 500 MHZ sometimes causes SD card corruption. Simultaneously in "High" mode the core clock speed was lowered from 450 to 250 MHz.
Higher clock speed because lower causes corruption? "changed from to"? A drop almost 50%? Could someone please check these numbers? --Guy Macon (talk) 12:50, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Categories: