This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Surfer43 (talk | contribs) at 20:46, 9 June 2013 (→User:Surfer43). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:46, 9 June 2013 by Surfer43 (talk | contribs) (→User:Surfer43)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| Requests for permissions | |
|---|---|
| Common | |
| Uncommon | |
| Logs | |
| Special | |
Reviewer/Article Feedback Reviewer
User:Mrfrobinson
- Mrfrobinson · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ()
- Would like to expand some of the work I do at WP:AfC into the established main space. I have a good history of non-problematic editing and a willingness to help! Mike (talk) 16:59, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) The reviewer flag has got nothing to do with WP:AFC. This permission you are asking for by no means helps one review AfC submissions; this permission only allows you to review pending changes on PC-protected pages. smtchahal 04:37, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) I must agree with Smtchahal above. For more information on what the Reviewer flag does, I recommend you visit WP:REVIEWER. Regards, smileguy91 16:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) The reviewer flag has got nothing to do with WP:AFC. This permission you are asking for by no means helps one review AfC submissions; this permission only allows you to review pending changes on PC-protected pages. smtchahal 04:37, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
User:Archcaster
- Archcaster · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ()
- Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Archcaster (talk) 17:39, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
I would like to become a reviewer because I want to review things that are acceptable to protected articles, not like vandalism or other inapporiate requested edits that users make.
Not done A review of your editing history and participation in discussions gives me strong reason to believe that you need more experience and a greater understanding of policies, especially vandalism. Give it time, do some pure vandalism reverting, and then apply again. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:17, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
User:Surfer43
- Surfer43 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ()
- I would like to help review pages on Misplaced Pages. I am familiar with the basic content policies, legal policies, and the guidline on reviewing. I have access to STiki and have used it over 650 times. I also have rollback rights. Surfer43 (talk) 02:11, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
User:Marcnut1996
- Marcnut1996 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ()
- I dislike vandalism across Misplaced Pages and I will revert vandalism if I ever see them, in addition to Misplaced Pages's vandalism policies. Also, I constantly add citations because I know uncited content will be removed. I know uncited contents are removed because there is no evidence to back it up. Marcnut1996 (talk) 06:03, 8 June 2013 (UTC)