This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Elliskev (talk | contribs) at 20:01, 1 June 2006 (rvv). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:01, 1 June 2006 by Elliskev (talk | contribs) (rvv)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)My archived talk pages can be found here 1/2/3...if you want to view them go ahead but please don't delete anything or reply on them. Reply or comment here. Thanks.
|
License tagging for Image:StFrancois.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:StFrancois.jpg. Misplaced Pages gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Misplaced Pages, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 09:06, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
"Safe sex" article
Move the categories out of it. Skinnyweed 18:12, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- No, you have a copy of the safe sex article with categories on one of your subpages and it turns up in the real categories: User:Chooserr/"safe sex". Skinnyweed 16:29, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Bijoutier.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bijoutier.jpg. Misplaced Pages gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Misplaced Pages, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 04:04, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Confirmation name
I have just checked with some Mexican religious sisters and found that taking a Confirmation name is quite unknown in their country, which might conceivably have been influenced by the Anglophone country to the north. A Spanish priest has also confirmed (please excuse the use of this word in a sense other than that of the article) what I already knew, that the custom is unknown in Spain.
I suspect that the Anglophone countries all got the custom from Ireland, which certainly adopted several French (as opposed to, say, Italian) religious customs at the dawn of religious emancipation in that country. I expect therefore that the custom also exists in France, but am unable just now to check.
I presume that your statement about German-speaking countries is based on certain knowledge.
The reason I omitted the book you mention is that, to have this not internationally known book reckoned a verifiable source worth citing, you must give, if not its ISBN number, at least the publisher or the place and date of its publication. Otherwise, it might be taken to be just some obscure booklet put together by some unauthorized individual out in Tangmalangmaloo. This time, I have left mention of the book in, expecting you to provide that necessary information.
Other changes are for style or exactitude. In particular, though the name is chosen beforehand, it is actually adopted (made one's own) only at confirmation and thus by someone who has passed beyond the stage of being merely a candidate to the stage of being a "confirmand", having been selected or accepted for Confirmation.
License tagging for Image:IoM.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:IoM.JPG. Misplaced Pages gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Misplaced Pages, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 05:05, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Redundant
Chooserr, please look up "redundant", and join us at Talk:Pro-choice, where, all the while you're revert warring with tags, you haven't said a word. Thank you. -GTBacchus 00:15, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Chooserr, hi. I don't know whether you're watching Pro-choice, but you're one of the people who's re-added tags to it, so I thought I'd ask whether you could please back those up with some specific suggestions on how to improve the article. Please see the last couple of sections at Talk:Pro-choice for more context. Tags that aren't backed up with specific suggestions, I'll feel free to remove in about a day. -GTBacchus 01:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, Chooserr. I'm working on some rewrites there based on a laundry list Jtdirl posted, and any input is appreciated. I'm sure you'll let me know if you notice I'm veering from the ol' NPOV. -GTBacchus 06:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Confirmation
Hi, Chooserr. Thanks for your message. Indeed, thanks for your messages, and I'm sorry I didn't answer the first one. I went to the Confirmation article when I got your message, and I was just reading through it and checking recent edits, when something happened that put it out of my mind for a while. And no, of course you haven't upset me. Glad you're still around, and glad that you're editing some less controversial articles. Remember, if you want to survive on Misplaced Pages, you have to be able to leave an article in the "bad version" without getting upset. See you around. God bless. AnnH ♫ 06:57, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Gay rights opposition
Thanks for cleaning up my very bad edit - my excuse is I was distracted by the kids but I'll be more careful next time! Sophia 17:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
.......I did wonder if it was a comment on my kids! Sophia 17:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Considering the entire concept of "the" gay agenda is POV, no, you're not very convincing. There can never be a singular agenda that applies to a group of people of any size that have no other factor in common. CovenantD 04:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
re: welcome
Thanks for the welcome. --Neconkanteri 04:55, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Subst
Hi, I just happened upon your welcome at User talk:Neconkanteri. Regardless that the user is an imposter, remember to substitute your templates (i.e. {{subst:welcome}}). This saves a lot of work for the servers. Thanks! Master of Puppets 04:58, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
User:Neconkanteri
Just so happens this is an imposter account of User:Naconkantari that hasn't been blocked yet. I have reported him. DGX 05:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from Pro-choice. Please be careful not to remove content from Misplaced Pages without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Wes! • c 05:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Condom
You recently changed the condom article, omitting one error message and misleading on the second (claiming to be reverting non-existent vandalism). This is unacceptable behavior. On top of your earlier attempt to get me blocked for making public service announcements, you have been acting in an unreasonable manner. Al 02:06, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Condom
Ok, what do you think they're for? Or, why is it better to say a possible effect than an intention? -GTBacchus 02:20, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Alienus explained it, nevermind. -GTBacchus 02:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Citations
Please read WP:CITE and Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources and familiarize yourself with what constitutes a reliable source. Also, please read the very beginning of my user page and note the pronoun I prefer to be used to refer to me. Catamorphism 09:24, 30 May 2006 (UTC)