Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hipal (talk | contribs) at 21:07, 18 July 2013 (→Replacing bikini main image: agree, applies to all edits from this account). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Kentongreening, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Kentongreening! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	I noticed replaced the photo in the infobox of Villa Romana del Casale with a higher quality image. It looks great, thanks for your help! To be honest I do think the photo of the skier you added there is a bit blurred, but it's certainly better than nothing. Hopefully someone else could add a sharper version of it in the future. AlexanderVanLoon (talk) 14:33, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Replacing bikini main image

Hello. I reverted your edit to bikini in which you unilaterally made the decision to replace the main article image. Please consider participating in discussion on the article's talk page here concerning adding and deleting images to the article and establish consensus before making such a profound change to the article in the future. Thank you for your willingness to acknowledge and respect the fact that there are other editors who would like a voice in future additions (or deletions) or even just changes to the article. Azx2 20:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

BTW - Idk if you actually read through the entire article, but there is an image of the bikini girls mosaic in the gallery subsection. It's of an individual "bikini girl," however, and not the entire mosaic. If you think the article would be better served with the full mosaic in the gallery, or even in addition to the single girl, I could see the logic in that and wouldn't oppose such an update. Regardless, it would be good to hear from you on that topic so we can all get onto same page. Cheers. Azx2 20:52, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

I agree with Azx2. While the images you've been adding might be appropriate in articles properly placed, most don't belong as proposed. The relevant guideline is MOS:IMAGES. --Ronz (talk) 21:07, 18 July 2013 (UTC)