This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Courcelles (talk | contribs) at 18:03, 30 July 2013 (→Tea Party movement case: re\). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:03, 30 July 2013 by Courcelles (talk | contribs) (→Tea Party movement case: re\)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archives |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Template:Convert/L/s impgal/min
could you reduce the protection on this template? it is currently broken and I would like to fix it. thank you. Frietjes (talk) 16:31, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
- Have fun. Courcelles 16:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Tea Party movement case
I received a notice from Callanecc today that there was a proposed motion on an ARBCOM case that affected me. Penwhale notified me of the case 16 July. I did not reply because no comments were made about me. AGK, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs and Silk Tork have voted to ban me. Could you please explain why I am part of this case. TFD (talk) 05:14, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- The arb to ask is NuclearWarfare, as he made the request of the clerks. I don't know why this was done, but he should be able to explain. Courcelles 18:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
DYK
Hi, feel free to elaborate on your !vote in the General Discussion section below Thanks for contributing.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 17:38, 30 July 2013 (UTC)