Misplaced Pages

talk:Neutral point of view/FAQ - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Neutral point of view

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Carolmooredc (talk | contribs) at 13:37, 31 July 2013 (RE: Calling "attention to the problem publicly": update and clarify question). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 13:37, 31 July 2013 by Carolmooredc (talk | contribs) (RE: Calling "attention to the problem publicly": update and clarify question)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Archives
Archive 1Archive 2


This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

RE: Calling "attention to the problem publicly"

Misplaced Pages:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ#Dealing_with_biased_contributors reads Unless the case is really egregious, maybe the best thing is to call attention to the problem publicly, pointing the perpetrators to this page...(etc)

This it means to me the first step is: discuss at the talk page per WP:Dispute, even start a new section on biased editing if necessary, quote the policy and list evidence of bias, like explicit biased statements by the editor. However, some editors will complain of personal attacks if you do it just once, not to mention if you need to do it again in that or another article. So any guidance on whether having to do it repeatedly because of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT is a problem. CarolMooreDC - talkie talkie🗽 15:46, 30 May 2013 (UTC)