Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dwaipayanc

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jetstreamer (talk | contribs) at 20:30, 12 August 2013 (Warning: Edit warring on Serengeti National Park. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:30, 12 August 2013 by Jetstreamer (talk | contribs) (Warning: Edit warring on Serengeti National Park. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72


This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

ALT

Hello, will you please use a proper ALT for the article List of awards and nominations received by Vidya Balan and please have a look through the whole page if you find a problem then fix it because i want to re-nominate it for FLC but i want an expert user get satisfied with the article for being nominated for FLC

talkback

Hello, Dwaipayanc. You have new messages at Bollyjeff's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NYC Wiki-Picnic: Saturday June 22

Great American Wiknic NYC at Prospect Park
You are invited to the Great American Wiknic NYC in Brooklyn's green and lovely Prospect Park, on this Saturday June 22! We would love to see you there, so sign up and bring something fun for the potluck :) -- User:Pharos (talk)

Hyderabad, India FAC

Hope you are aware that Hyderabad, India is being reviewed. Hope it will pass this time, waiting with crossed fingers and just want to say All is well. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 17:30, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Okay I will re-nominating it again. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 11:14, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
I think due to the article size the reviewers hesitate to involve, any way I have dropped the review request at Dr. Blofeld talk page also, as he reviewed the article and give some positive development advices during FAC-4. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 14:02, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks once again for your contenious help, and answering the Hyd-FAC. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 12:12, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, any advice for Hyderabad FAC, as almost since one week there is no responce from Tony, ( I had seen your request on Tony's talk page ), Is there any place were we can request for more reviewers. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 03:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

How to make template

Do you know how to make a template, such as {{|Muhammad Iqbal}} and {{|Rabindranath Tagore}} I want to create a template for Sarojni naidu, can you help or direct me where we can learn to make a template. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 04:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Satyajit Ray

That he was the first President of FFSI is significant information. It should find a place in this article. The section on 1959 talks of his Filmography and that was not apt. If not the lead section, then where do you suggest it should go? SP 04:20, 25 July 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pramanick (talk • contribs)

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

Today's featured article for Kahaani

Hey Dwai! Talkin' after a long time. Are you interested in nominating Kahaani for Today's featured article? If you are, reply in my talk page. Thanks, ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 13:18, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Well, I think it will be great if we would wait untill Vidya Balan's birthday comes on 1 January 2014 for the TFA. After all, she was the hero of Kahaani! What's your thoughts about it?----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 06:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Good afternoon

Since u still appear to take part in the peer review of Chandralekha, why not do some more editing of it? Pls take a break from other projects and edit it, particularly the Casting and Filming sections? Kailash29792 (talk) 07:27, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2013-07-29

Re: hello

Hey, I have been good. Also, getting into some trouble. (:P) Anyway, my next aim is to take Ranbir Kapoor to a GA, and then FA! I would also want to work on Pather Panchali in the near future. --smarojit 06:46, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

It would be great if we could collaborate on the article together. If you have some of those online sources, could you mail them to me? --smarojit 11:06, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Just nominated Ranbir Kapoor for GA. Phew! :) --smarojit 17:43, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Help

Hey Dwai! Since, you have written so many articles. Blofeld suggested me to get your feedback for my list at its PR. That would be very helpful. Thanks.—Prashant 16:16, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

I am planning Barfi! as my next FA after Chopra filmography FLC. Would you please help me as you had worked on several Bengal topics. I can provide you some sources for its themes and allusions/inspirations. I will expand the development section from its Bonus feature of the DVD. Few articles are also in my inbox. Are you willing to work on it as i plan it to nominate it next year (I'll be offline due to my studies from 12 August).—Prashant 08:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Final Analysis

I request you to do a final and thorough analysis of Chandralekha 1948, because I am deciding to close the peer review of it. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:52, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

PR

You're needed at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Tiruchirappalli/archive2. —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:47, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

Hyderabad is FA!

Yay! Well done to you and Omer! Time for a celebration :) --Stfg (talk) 14:20, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Wiki-Dronacharya Award

Wiki-Dronacharya Award
For everything you contributed in general for India related articles. Your idealistic thoughts, dedicated guidance and passion is remarkable, for which you deserved to be called as wiki-Guru .

I have no words to thank for your contribution at Hyderabad and on this day its FA comes as a Eidi (eid gift) for me. I wish if some time you and Stfg would visit Hyderabad. Regards!!! --Omer123hussain (talk) 16:22, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Maya Sita/GA1

Thanks for the review. I have replied. I am busy in real life and will take more time (more than 1 week) to respond than usual. --Redtigerxyz 06:32, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Peer review

Hi. You're invited to participate in a peer review for the Mughal-e-Azam article at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Mughal-e-Azam/archive1. I hope that constructive input from several people can better prepare it for FAC. It probably needs several pairs of eyes who don't know much about Indian film to comment on as much as it needs experts to comment..♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Important sources for Mughal-e-Azam

I got some sources.

I hope they are useful.—Prashant 02:33, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank

Thank you very much for the barnstar. I also thank u for taking part in the peer review that elevated Parasakthi. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring on Bengal article to preserve tons of unsourced and previously challenged material in violation of Misplaced Pages policy

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Your edit warring diffs:
(1) http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Bengal&action=historysubmit&diff=568159689&oldid=568153522
(2) http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Bengal&action=historysubmit&diff=568167451&oldid=568165911
(3) http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Bengal&action=historysubmit&diff=568169588&oldid=568168784

The diff of your recruiting someone else to continue your edit war while you are away from Misplaced Pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3ATitodutta&action=historysubmit&diff=568168098&oldid=568116310

The diff of that person continuing your edit war:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Bengal&diff=prev&oldid=568170598
AfricaTanz (talk) 06:18, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the warning. This is a correct step you have taken, you have cited a policy. Please do the same in the article talk page. Bye the way, those materials that were deleted, were those previously challenged? How much earlier? Did someone remove the tags or something?--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta

Hello, Dwaipayanc. You have new messages at Titodutta's talk page.
Message added 06:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

See my poem Tito☸Dutta 06:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring about citation formats in Serengeti National Park

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Your edit warring diffs:
(1) http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Serengeti_National_Park&action=historysubmit&diff=568166728&oldid=566192829
(2) http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Serengeti_National_Park&action=historysubmit&diff=568171002&oldid=568170114

The citation formats were changed here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Serengeti_National_Park&action=historysubmit&diff=566151148&oldid=564330086

That change was then reverted, 15 days ago, with article stability following the reversion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Serengeti_National_Park&action=historysubmit&diff=566192829&oldid=566151148

You then started an edit war as diff'd above. AfricaTanz (talk) 06:41, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

this is hardly an edit war ( yet!). I just added back the retrieval dates of the online references, which is a great thing to have for online references. A keen follower of references that you are, you should know better than I.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:50, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
You should educate yourself about what "edit warring" entails. AfricaTanz (talk) 07:02, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
True, since I am not accustomed to it. Perhaps you can guide me, with your experience :)--Dwaipayan (talk) 07:05, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Warning

You and several others have been edit-warring wildly on Bengal. This is unacceptable. 

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:16, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Serengeti National Park. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jetstreamer  20:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)