This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Giovanni33 (talk | contribs) at 17:13, 5 June 2006 (why revert my comments?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:13, 5 June 2006 by Giovanni33 (talk | contribs) (why revert my comments?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Don't goYou only let the trolls and bullies win by leaving. FeloniousMonk 05:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
I would like to reassure you that I, and I believe a majority of the ArbCom if not in fact all of us, do NOT welcome MSK or BluAardvark back to Misplaced Pages; in fact, quite the reverse. I believe those who do are a tiny percentage of Misplaced Pages's admins, let alone the organisation itself inasmuch as such exists. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 06:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC) No, no, no! Slim, stay with us! We've lost one of the very nicest admins in the last few days — we can't afford to lose another of them. AnnH ♫ 09:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Don't go, if you do it would be one of the worst things to happen to wikipedia Jaranda 15:32, 29 May 2006 (UTC) Even soI do trust linuxbeak implicitly. I hope we can discuss on skype or so sometime soon. Kim Bruning 10:26, 29 May 2006 (UTC) Take a breakTake a break, but don't go away. :-) Kim Bruning 08:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Take a break, and come back a new person. ;-) -Dna4salE 10:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC) Ditto. — mark ✎ 10:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC) This is a huge loss for Misplaced Pages. Few, if any, editors have been more effective advocates of making Misplaced Pages into a source of accurate, reliable information than Sarah. This brings Misplaced Pages a step closer to just becoming a social club for internet trolls with no interest in writing an encyclopedia. 172 | Talk 22:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC) This rhetoric is unhealthy! Anyway, I have a request - could you please come back and help me proof-read this ever-controversial article? Sometimes it is good just to edit/read articles :). RN 22:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
You've been truffled by CharlieCharlie has given you some of his famous Solid chocolate truffles! Chocolate truffles taste good, help moods, promote WikiLove and hopefully make your day better. Hope you find the truffles to be tasty, and make sure you enjoy them with a nice tall glass of milk (they're rich)! Have some chocolate & stick around!!! We need good people to stay! --Charlie 14:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
In caseIn case, you have decided to go, please wait for few moments: please touch your heart and think: would it look nice to part in this way? I know our system has several lacunae, but we can surely continue here to realize the best-ever dream of human civilization: to build the sum total of human knowledge. I too disagree with several aspects of our functioning, yet I am continuing as I know that we are the most resilient virtual community, and we shall deliver what we have promised to deliver to the human civilization. Come on, and continue. --Bhadani 17:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Why the blank user page?Hi SlimVirgin. What gives? Thanks! --Tom 17:36, 29 May 2006 (UTC) Please don't leaveDon't let the trolls win. User:Zoe| 20:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
If You Can Hack It OutYour good offices and your humanity, along with those others who then came to assist, persuaded me to hang in. Please consider the importance of such qualities in so potentially volatile a venue as this. That said, WP, while an important asset, is not of necessity the center of all things. Place yourself first. Thanks, again, for your help in the past, and, if you so determine, in future. – Best. Fucyfre 20:13, 29 May 2006 (UTC) Adding a voice to the chorusI formally request that you stay instead of leaving. DS 01:29, 30 May 2006 (UTC) WithdrawalI've been reading the entries at ] and, for what it's worth, as a newbie, I agree with SV's position, whatever components of personal emotion and/or tactic it may comprise. I will watch to see what happens, what she decides, and to draw appropriate conclusions as to how effective WP can, in fact, be in the processes by which it attempts to function in its stated goals. Fucyfre 02:13, 30 May 2006 (UTC) SupportI will be a copycat and join the chorus of people asking you to stay, despite the actions of the loathesome trolls at WR and the wildly clueless actions of a certain bureaucrat. I realize that talk is cheap, and I'm not the one dealing with whatever you're being put through, but nonetheless I want to say that I support you, and whatever help I can offer I'm offering. Send e-mail if necessary. --Calton | Talk 04:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
I Think AlsoThat there may be need on the part of those more senior at WP to restructure some procedures. I may be new to WP, but I am not new to this sort of problem. It requires addressing. Fucyfre 05:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Don't let the bastids grind you downDo you think a cup of tea and a lemon-curd sarnie might be enough to tempt you back? Or am I going to have to open up the custard cream biscuits? Grace Note 06:29, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Seeking Editor Review Commentary (If You Like)Hi. In conjunction with my RfA (that you voted on), I have created an editor review, to give people a chance to comment as to ways in which I can branch out or alter my contributions to Misplaced Pages. An RfA seems to solely focus on how one's temperment and contributions relate to how they might handle administrative powers (and the consensus on that seems to be that I'm not quite ready); the editor review opens things up a little more to a larger focus, and I'd love to hear community feedback in the sense of that larger focus, too. If you feel you've already expressed yourself sufficiently when casting your vote, then by all means don't worry about it, but if any thoughts come to mind or if you'd like to expound upon any suggestions or commentary, it would be appreciated. In any case, I appreciated you taking the time to express your opinion on my RfA, and I thank you for that. — WCityMike (talk • contribs) 19:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC) Not sure if you'll read thisBut if you'd drop in MSN sometime, we could probably work this out. Redwolf24 (talk) 02:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC) Support: Three barnstarsSince, in over three years of editing on Misplaced Pages, I have never awarded anyone any Misplaced Pages:Barnstars, I hereby solemnly award User:SlimVirgin three of them now. This tripleheader award is in recognition of all the critical roles she has always played on Misplaced Pages. All who agree are urged to sign below. In sincerest admiration, and hoping for a speedy return, IZAK 06:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
New Age hoax?http://en.wikipedia.org/Ah-ni-ku-ta-ni I have contacted professor Fogelson at the University of Chicago about this one. Mooney makes no mention of this. If this is a hoax this is quite offensive. Professor Fogelson only makes mention of the name, not tablets that predate the old testament.
LoveMonkey 11:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC) Goodbye?Removed messaged from banned user Zordrac (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) -- Malber (talk • contribs) 15:21, 3 June 2006 (UTC) Saladin1970I have unblocked Saladin1970 to participate in his arbitration case. He is expected to limit editing to arbitration pages and his own user pages. Fred Bauder 13:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC) Smile-- Malber (talk • contribs) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing! One of life's ironiesHi Slim, It sounds crazy, but I was visiting your talk page to discuss a blocking policy I'm thinking of proposing (basically, a partial block that'd stop vandalising IPs from editing articles but allowing them to edit talk pages). One of the things I admire about you is your emphasis on civility. A lot of "senior" wikipedians don't value civility as much. When I had enough of incivility while discussing Israel-related articles, I didn't quit, I changed to a topic that wouldn't attract incivility. I won't say don't go, just look after yourself, and I hope you come back some day soon. Cheers, Andjam 13:27, 2 June 2006 (UTC) Not sure it will matter to you much anymore...Not sure who this is (or whose sock he is), but as you were mentioned by name, thought I'd keep you up to date if you weren't already aware (If you're even still around). See ya (maybe). --You Know Who 18:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC) Oleg of NovgorodSome of your special brand of common sense would be useful here... Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 19:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC) Are you a ReveredLeaderHmmm, meatball:ReveredLeader seems a lot like the (anti)pattern you are encountering. Kim Bruning 01:27, 3 June 2006 (UTC) Five daysFive days without her look like five long years! --Bhadani 10:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Your user talk page is of limited valueApparently people are occaisionally removing messages to you, mostly messages that have a negative element to them. Unfortunately that means that trolling and criticism are being treated in the same way. It's going to be difficult for you to get a balanced image of the situation this way. Be sure to check your page history, at least. Kim Bruning 13:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Welcome back (I hope)Maybe this welcome back is premature, but hope springs eternal... IronDuke 01:21, 4 June 2006 (UTC) I've been refreshing my watchlist and looking eagerly at this page and the user page, but was afraid to jump to (happy) conclusions too soon. Please tell us we're right, Slim. AnnH ♫ 01:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
The life is coming back! Good news. --Bhadani 08:46, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
My ThanksI wanted to drop a brief note on your talk page (one admittedly not written to you only, but nevertheless truly meant) to thank you for your vote in my Request for Adminship, which concluded this evening. Even though it was unsuccessful, it did make clear to me some areas in which I can improve my contributions to Misplaced Pages, both in terms of the areas in which I can participate and the manner in which I can participate. I do plan on, at some point in the future (although, I think, not the near future), attempting the process again, and I hope you will consider participating in that voting process as well. If you wish in the future to offer any constructive criticism to me, or if I may assist you with anything, I hope you will not hesitate to contact me. Thanks again. — WCityMike ⇓ plz reply HERE (why?) ⇓ 04:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC) Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Saladin1970 appealHello, An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Saladin1970 appeal. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Saladin1970 appeal/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Saladin1970 appeal/Workshop. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Tony Sidaway 14:07, 4 June 2006 (UTC) Table fixIf you need a table fix, let me know.... -- Kim van der Linde 04:16, 5 June 2006 (UTC) welcome backI hope you are indeed back. Zeq 09:45, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
|