This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) at 07:00, 4 September 2013 (Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 60d) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Gender Studies/Archive 4.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:00, 4 September 2013 by MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) (Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 60d) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Gender Studies/Archive 4.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Gender studies and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Gender studies NA‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Gender studies: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2024-08-05
I need the help of an administrator!!I need the help of an administrator on an article involving a women's health issue. A male doctor is deleting the info provided by female doctors. If there is an administrator who can help, please contact me Drzuckerman 02:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Possessive Terminology?I'm not sure how using the terms wife/husband is necessarily possessive. It's noun describing a relationship. If I'm someone's sibling, parent or friend, I am not their property. Why does marriage necessarily indicate ownership? Certainly, the expression "man and wife" does suggest ownership, but "husband and wife" (or "husband and husband" for that matter) does not, does it? - TheMightyQuill 22:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm not as far off the guide as you might think Neitherday, when I said ""styling" or characterizing of a subject tends towards POV because it does not focus on the subject's own notability" I am including "referring to someone as the wife of (or husband of)". In the line: "A is married to B" such a POV or privelaging does not take place - that in my interpretation is the essence of the guideline. Just a BTW the gudielines have been moved to a new department for "countering systemic gender bias"--Cailil 13:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
|
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Gender studies and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Category:Women sociologists
Category:Women sociologists has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Meclee (talk) 23:44, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Pangender
An article in this WikiProject, Pangender, has been proposed for a merge with the article Genderqueer. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. April Arcus (talk) 07:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Page Name
Why is it named the wikiproject gender studies, when that's rather clunky and gender studies is obviously feminism heavy? shouldn't the page be named something more un-biased, for lack of a better term? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bumblebritches57 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Categories: