Misplaced Pages

:Closure requests - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by I JethroBT (talk | contribs) at 19:13, 9 September 2013 (→Talk:Double-headed eagle#RfC:What are the best criteria for including images in the 'examples' gallery?: done.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:13, 9 September 2013 by I JethroBT (talk | contribs) (→Talk:Double-headed eagle#RfC:What are the best criteria for including images in the 'examples' gallery?: done.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards

    Archives
    Index
    Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
    Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
    Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
    Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
    Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
    Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18
    Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21
    Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24
    Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27
    Archive 28Archive 29Archive 30
    Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33
    Archive 34Archive 35Archive 36
    Archive 37Archive 38Archive 39

    This page has archives. Sections older than 40 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
    Shortcuts

    The Requests for closure noticeboard is for posting requests to have an uninvolved editor assess, summarize, and formally close a discussion on Misplaced Pages. Formal closure by an uninvolved editor or administrator should be requested where consensus remains unclear, where the issue is a contentious one, or where there are wiki-wide implications.

    Please note that most discussions do not need formal closure. Where consensus is clear, any editor—even one involved in the discussion—may close the discussion, provided the discussion has been open long enough for a consensus to form. The default length of an RfC is 30 days; where consensus becomes clear before that and discussion is not ongoing, the discussion can be closed earlier, although it should not be closed sooner than one week except in the case of WP:SNOW.

    Please ensure that your request here for a close is neutrally worded, and do not use this board to continue the discussion in question. If there is disagreement with a particular closure, do not dispute it here. You can start discussion at the original page or request a Closure review at Administrators' noticeboard with a link to the discussion page and the policy-based reason you believe the closure should be overturned.

    Notes about closing

    Because requests for closure made here are often those that are the most contentious, closing these discussions can be a significant responsibility. Closers should be familiar with all policies and guidelines that could apply to the given discussion. All closers should be prepared to fully discuss the closure rationale with any editors who have questions about the closure or the underlying policies, and to provide advice about where to discuss any remaining concerns that those editors may have.

    A request for comment discussed how to appeal closures and whether an administrator can summarily overturn a non-administrator's closure. The consensus was that closures should not be reverted solely because the closer was not an administrator. However, special considerations apply for articles for deletion and move discussions—see Misplaced Pages:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions and Misplaced Pages:Requested moves/Closing instructions for details.

    Requests for closure

    See also: Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion, and Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion § Old discussions

    Wikipedia_talk:Disambiguation#WP:PDAB

    Rather complex RfC that could benefit from a formal closure. The discussion appears to have died down since the end of July. Someone not using his real name (talk) 17:55, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

    Comment. I participated in this discussion. Although the discussion is lengthy, I think the outcome is rather clear. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:06, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

    Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User names

    I've just got done clearing out all the old business there, except for two cases where I had expressed an opinion. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:50, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

     Done the Inanygivenhole section. Armbrust 16:25, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
     Comment: Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/User_names#Dalermehndi123 is still open. Armbrust 22:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

    Misplaced Pages:Move review/Log/2013 August#Journey Through the Decade

    This move review request has been open for two weeks; it should be ready for a close. --BDD (talk) 21:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

    Template_talk:Infobox_snooker_player#Recent_changes

    This has been open now since 3 weeks, and largely inactive in the last 8 days. Armbrust 14:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

    Talk:Revere the King, Expel the Barbarians#Requested move

    Even ignoring the fact that consensus is clearly leaning in favour of the move, per WP:BRD unilateral moves that are challenged should be reverted automatically. That the RM lasted a week in this context is disturbing. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 03:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

     Done. Cheers! bd2412 T 17:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

    Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 17

    open for several weeks. Frietjes (talk) 14:55, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

    Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 18

    open for several weeks. Frietjes (talk) 14:55, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

    Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 19

    open for several weeks. Frietjes (talk) 14:55, 7 September 2013 (UTC) open for several weeks. Frietjes (talk) 14:55, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

    Misplaced Pages talk:did you know#Remove restrictions on Gibraltar articles?

    I believe either the consensus has reached, or is the consensus inadequate. There was a prior consensus in Misplaced Pages talk:Did you know/Gibraltar-related DYKs, or so I thought. If inadequate, can we centralize it in WP:VPPR? --George Ho (talk) 17:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

    Template_talk:Location_map_Syria#Further_discussion

    I'm not sure that the current situation is a consensus and in any case some editors would really question me if i close the discussion not the way the prefer it. External opinion is hence needed to finalize the discussion which default map should be used for template:Location map Syria.Greyshark09 (talk) 20:26, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

    Talk:Double-headed eagle#RfC:What are the best criteria for including images in the 'examples' gallery?

    This RfC has been going for 30 days, and it looks like a consensus has been reached. Since I opened the RfC, however, I would appreciate a formal closure before I act on what I perceive as a general (though not unanimous) consensus supporting my position. Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 03:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

     Done. I, JethroBT 19:13, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

    Talk:Chelsea Manning gender identity media coverage

    There are two discussions which have gone on long enough and are ready for a close here:

    Note that if the merge discussion is closed with consensus to merge, the RM becomes unnecessary. --BDD (talk) 17:02, 9 September 2013 (UTC)