User talk:LM2000 - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BGCTwinsEdit (talk | contribs) at 15:58, 20 September 2013 (→Enough). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:58, 20 September 2013 by BGCTwinsEdit (talk | contribs) (→Enough)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

You may have been redirected here after attempting to view my user page. Alas I do not feel the need to have such a page so I have sent you here. But I would appreciate a message from you nonetheless! Just do me a favor and be nice... Unless I've done something wrong, in which case feel free to let me have it.

Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative

Hi,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Layfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Josh Matthews (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

February 2013

This is your only warning; if you violate Misplaced Pages's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Misplaced Pages page again, as you did at Eric the Midget, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

I inserted none of the sort! LM2000 (talk) 02:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Funkadactyls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TMZ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Doubting good faith . . .

or questioning whether the person has even read the article, is not a really good way to address a tag. I have read the article. And I do question the neutrality, just the same way I question the whole way the English media has handled the Savile affair, as I would call it. For 50 years the English media delighted in the guy. Four women make unsubstantiated allegations against him in a documentary a year after his death and suddenly he's the devil himself. When I start pointing out media that is favorable to Savile such as a woman's claim that she had a 40 year off and on relationship with him and refuting the paedophile claims http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2069358/Jimmy-Saviles-secret-lover-Sue-Hymns-talks-VERY-unconventional-life-together.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koueH9D04yg I am told that The Daily Mail is not a reliable source, even after the article uses a Daily Mail source in an attempt to accuse Savile of paedophllia through speculation and hearsay. Also, the article does not use BBC and other news reports that exonerate Savile: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xrp6cHjets. That particular video features an Assistant Chief Constable on the West Yorkshire Police force stating that it does not have any evidence nor reports against Savile, let alone any criminal charges against him.

I think this is a witch hunt. All it is is a bunch of posthumous he said/she said stuff.

Compare the Savile Article against the Joe Paterno and Penn State Child Sex Abuse Articles and there is no comparison. Misplaced Pages is like the English Court of Public Opinion, out for a witch hunt that the facts do not substantiate.johncheverly 02:29, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

If you compare Savile's article to convicted predators, like the aforementioned Sandusky, it should be apparent that the language used in these articles is completely different because Sandusky was convicted and Savile was not. You also questioned why about his friendship with Thatcher was not mentioned but it actually is. Another user mentioned this to you as well. With that aside I reverted your edit because I felt it went against consensus based on what I was reading in talk. Many of the tags including autobiography, needing citations, global, etc. were also irrelevant. I'm sorry I could not have been more eloquent in my edit summary and I hope you weren't offended. Hope this clears everything up..LM2000 (talk) 03:19, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Apology accepted and since you are not talking to me like Ol'GrumpAss, or whatever it's name is, I have concisely put these specific citations down where I was asked about what I would like to see included in the Savile Article/s . . .I think it's important they be taken into account. I wanted to get someone on here that is a barrister or solicitor in the UK to provide legal context as to what the legal climate was like in the 60s and 70s when a lot of this stuff was alleged to have taken place. Finally, Sanduskey was given do process of law, if you remember, Eight victims sat in the same Court Room with him and gave testimony against him. IMHO, the Savile thing is a public character assassination to get 30 million pounds worth of insurance money out of the BBC.johncheverly 04:24, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Whatever you think the significance of all that might be, it seems irrelevant to improving the content of the article. All this correspondence was discussed before Thatcher's death, and is mentioned under "Public image and friendships" in his biography article. What changes do you think should be made to the article? Ghmyrtle (talk) 5:32 pm, Yesterday (UTC−4)

I definitely think there needs to be some quotes from Sir Jimmy Savile OBE's mistress Sue Hymns that "There's absolutely nothing there. People make those things up."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koueH9D04yg http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2069358/Jimmy-Saviles-secret-lover-Sue-Hymns-talks-VERY-unconventional-life-together.html

Also, his neice, Amanda McKenna, also has refuted the scandalous stories.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koueH9D04yg

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jimmy-saviles-family-reveal-their-outrage-870828

And she tells how she was hurt over the years by false rumours about her uncle. BBC’s Newsnight even began an investigation into unfounded allegations relating to under-aged girls.

She says: “Uncle Jimmy always said, ‘People were looking for the big secret about me but the big secret is that there isn’t one’.”

Any mentions of his posthumous AUTHORIZED BIOGRAPHY??? Why not???

http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/features/leader/9806293.The_real_Jimmy/

Also, of the over 40 people that claim they were "molested" by Savile in the West Yorkshire region of England, NONE ever reported the incident to the West Yorkshire Police, and there is no evidence of any criminal behavior by Savile.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xrp6cHjets

Paul Gambiccini's Claims??? Why are they even included in this article??? Listen to all 11:30 minutes of this interview:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DutNY63LqO0 Complete bullshit there. This motherfucker has no concrete information. It's all a bunch of hot air by a has-been that never made it.

Talk about payoffs, don't you think you ought to add info from this article??? http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/savile-to-cost-bbc-insurers-millions-8590981.html

Show me the fucking money=30 million pounds worth.

Also, what's the statute of limitations on the charges against Max Clifford, Freddie Starr, Rolf Harris, Jim Davidson, etcetera??? These guys are in their late 60's, early 70s now.

Is there anyone on Misplaced Pages that can give some kind of context of the English Legal system??? Were the laws the same in the 1960s and 1970s as they are today???

These are the things that are nagging me and that I come to Misplaced Pages for wanting to read FACTUAL ANSWERS ON.johncheverly 04:24, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Service Award

This editor is a
**Novice Editor**
and is entitled to display this **Service Badge**.

You're welcome. (User talk:Vjmlhds) Vjmlhds 22:44, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Kane is his common name listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kane is his common name. Since you had some involvement with the Kane is his common name redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). noq (talk) 17:19, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Destination X (2013), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. EuroCarGT 00:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Just for the record, I was reverting edits that were not constructive made by an IP. The IP has gone on to edit war and if you had checked the revision history you would have seen my previous justifications, those justifications were based on the consensus of a rather lengthy discussion on WP:PW. If anyone is the be warned it is the IP (who was actually already warned by a bot who actually detected his unproductive behavior), make sure you review the revision history more closely next time.LM2000 (talk) 01:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

RE

Thanks. I think too. Also, he had discussions in Pokemon articles and an user support you. :) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

RE: Airbender

Understood, although if you want some sources that call it one of the worst, I know some examples. I can add the film to the list again with these credentials if you wish.

--Matthew (talk) 23:15, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heath Slater, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Big Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Enough

No disrepect intended but please stop erasing the contents on JoJo Offerman's page. You are the ONLY one who seems to always have a problem. I have not recieved any other complaints from any other wikipedia user besides you. I have not added ANY false information to JoJo's page and not to mention, I also created her wikipedia page. Therefore I will continue to re add the information. So please back off. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BGCTwinsEdit (talk • contribs) 15:52, 20 September 2013 (UTC)