This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AndyTheGrump (talk | contribs) at 13:54, 3 November 2013 (→Misrepresentation of sources: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:54, 3 November 2013 by AndyTheGrump (talk | contribs) (→Misrepresentation of sources: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome
Hello, GrunterVonHaart207$!, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}
November 2013
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Demographics of atheism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Demographics of atheism was changed by GrunterVonHaart207$! (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916865 on 2013-11-03T12:51:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:51, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Misrepresentation of sources
Please note that I have reverted your edits to Demographics of atheism. Not only had you removed substantial sourced content, but you had blatantly misrepresented the source you cited. Such behaviour is liable to result in you being blocked from editing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:54, 3 November 2013 (UTC)