This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) at 00:28, 19 December 2013 (→Deletion of Rexzooly: - reply: GNG, I know those feels). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:28, 19 December 2013 by ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) (→Deletion of Rexzooly: - reply: GNG, I know those feels)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
Sysops, if you are confident that an administrative action I have taken was in error, please feel free to revert it and leave a note on my talk page. If you are not an administrator, please leave a note on my talk page or go to WP:AN if more urgency is required. |
My Talk Archives | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 7 sections are present. |
|
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello ErikHaugen! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Interview
Hi, my name is Pedro Rodriguez. I am a student at Michigan State University, working on an exploration of the Misplaced Pages adminship process under Jonathan Obar. You had previously showed interest in being a interviewee for our study. I can conduct the interview via Skype or email, whichever you prefer. I can be contacted at my email: rodri397@msu.edu to set up a time to Skype or , if you wish, to obtain your email to conduct the interview that way. Thank you for your participation in our study. SirGuybrush (talk)
Marion County, West Virginia
While it is no Yoknapatawpha County, Marion County is a constant in the 1632 series. Indeed, an electronic catalog of the holdings of the Marion County Public Library is used as one of the guidelines for what an SF writer working in the series should expect to be available in Grantville. Marion County officials, equipment, etc. are mentioned on a regular basis. It may not seem like much, but these books have sold millions of copies; and it's a lot more presence than the typical West Virginia county has ever had in literature; Matewan comes closest, but of course that's a town, not a county. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:47, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- I agree that Marion County (well, Mannington, at least) is significant to the 1632 series. But not vice versa. It's hardly mentioned in the stories AFAIK; there is very little "presence in literature" here. We can quibble all we want about this, though, the real question is: do you have any sources backing up this claim that the series is significant to the subject of the article? (The note in 1632's afterward is not relevant in the slightest for this question, of course.) If not, then it's unverifiable, so let's take it out of the article. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 18:29, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Let's move this to a better forum: Talk:Mannington,_West_Virginia#1632_series ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 18:35, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Rorquals (oh sorry, I don't think you know what those are)
So I'm misguided, am I? Did you have to look that up? Is that because you know nothing about rorquals? Why do you run your mouth about subjects you apparently know little to nothing about? It appears to be an epidemic among wikipedians. Google something and pretend to know something about it only to be exposed as a fraud. That's adorable. Perhaps you should stick to doing edits intended for bots? Don't post on my talk page again. SHFW70 (talk) 21:27, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- Beg pardon? What do you think I don't know about, and why? ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:51, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Surveillance Camera Man for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surveillance Camera Man is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Surveillance Camera Man until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 02:36, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Leon Danielian article deletion
Hi, You have completely deleted the article Leon Danielian that I have created yesterday. I have spent more than an hour writing the article and it is completely gone on the grounds of "copyright violation". I have no idea which parts you did not like, but it would have been better if you had left at least some parts of it to develop on. Could you please return my work back. GuggiePrg (talk) 19:14, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- GuggiePrg, thanks for taking the time to write this article, and I think we really ought to have an article on this subject, so I appreciate what you're doing.
I have no idea which parts you did not like
—it's not that I didn't like them; they were nice, it's just that a good chunk of the article was copied from other sources. For example, you wroteIn 1959 he retired from the stage because of arthritis.
This utexas.edu memoriam article has the lineMr. Danielian retired from the stage in 1959 because of arthritis
, which is almost identical. Similarly for most(?) of the article. We simply can not do this; Misplaced Pages's servers, etc, are located in the US, which has, for better or worse, quite robust copyright law.it would have been better if you had left at least some parts of it to develop on
—There wouldn't be much left. Most of what was left would be the part copied from Gaîté Parisienne (which would still require proper attribution, for example in your edit summary).Could you please return my work back.
—No, I don't think I can restore it, again due to the legal issues. Although feel free to ask a different administrator to do it; someone might know more about copyright law and be able to help you. You may be able to find some of your prose in Google's cache for some amount of time if it is helpful to use it as an outline while rewriting this if you would like to do that. I've also restored the references at User:ErikHaugen/Leon Danielian so you don't need to fuss with those templates, at least. Please let me know if you think there's anything else I can restore.
- Thanks! ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 22:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
I have created a small text based on the previous full version at User:ErikHaugen/Leon Danielian. In case it does not violate the copyright law of your country please migrate it to the article section. Thanks! GuggiePrg (talk) 14:27, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for working on this! I've moved it to Leon Danielian. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:22, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, ErikHaugen. You have new messages at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Damaged beyond repair.Message added 01:27, 11 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hell In A Bucket (talk) 01:27, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Deletion of Rexzooly
This page is not about a person but the meaning behind a created name what was fiction but is now real and legal, I am still trying to understand wiki as its still very confusing, I created the name and have had many people ask me the meaning behind the name, this is why I have created a wiki about it, I also placed a very clear note at the bottom stating it was only about the meaning of the name not the creator of the name, if you felt it was placed wrong or worded wrong then please explain but don't just delete my work, you might think its easy to create something but others in the world its a little harder and I found it rude was deleted, did you even read the my talk page on the matter? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rexzooly (talk • contribs) 00:13, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Well, the main thing to understand is that for there to be a stand-alone Misplaced Pages article on something, it needs to have significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Please click on that link for a discussion of what the terms in that phrase mean. Is "Rexzooly" discussed in newspapers, magazines, books, online or off-, etc? Believe me, I know how you feel. My article was deleted, too: Surveillance Camera Man. And that was about a subject covered in news articles and even discussed on Boing Boing! In any case, I didn't mean to be rude and I'm sorry it felt that way. I know you spent some time on this and I would be happy to get the contents of the deleted article if you didn't save a copy of it and would like to host it on your own website or something. Please let me know! ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 00:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)