This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Middle 8 (talk | contribs) at 19:44, 3 January 2014 (ns: Why is GERAC a supposed WP:COATRACK? Take a moment to explain this, please, or let it go). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:44, 3 January 2014 by Middle 8 (talk | contribs) (ns: Why is GERAC a supposed WP:COATRACK? Take a moment to explain this, please, or let it go)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Why is GERAC a supposed WP:COATRACK? Take a moment to explain this, please, or let it go
Quackguru, I just asked you (again) on this page why you think GERAC is a WP:COATRACK. You just wrote in your ES -- which is all I have to go by since you refuse to leave anything on this page -- this non-answer: "Editors have already explained what is pure coatrack at the GERAC talk page." No, they sure haven't. Or on the off chance that I've missed it. So I'm asking you to explain it, briefly, in a sentence or two. See Talk:GERAC, bottom of RfC discussion.
What's so hard about this? I'd me more than happy to let it go, but you keep bringing it up, so apparently it's important to you for some reason. Giving non-answers is WP:IDHT and poor WP:DR. And I'm not joining any consensus that agrees GERAC is a coatrack. Just answer already, or stop bringing it up, please. --Middle 8 (talk) 19:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC)