| It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:Looks more like a category or stand-alone list than an article. Even then, both the subject and inclusion criteria are unclear. If this refers to a particular field of study, most of the names on the list do not belong. If it refers to a particular outlook on technology, we already have Critique of technology and Neo-luddism among several others. "Development" as a subject for criticism has many more meanings than "technological development," which is either (a) vague, (b) value-laden, or (c) duplicitous of a better defined subject. The disambiguation page for "Development" lists no form of "development" that fits with the general "technological" subject of this page.
If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it.
This message has remained in place for seven days, so the article may be deleted without further notice.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article so that it is acceptable according to the deletion policy.
Find sources: "Development criticism" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTORPRODExpired+%5B%5BWP%3APROD%7CPROD%5D%5D%2C+concern+was%3A+Looks+more+like+a+category+or+stand-alone+list+than+an+article.+Even+then%2C+both+the+subject+and+inclusion+criteria+are+unclear.+If+this+refers+to+a+particular+field+of+study%2C+most+of+the+names+on+the+list+do+not+belong.+If+it+refers+to+a+particular+outlook+on+technology%2C+we+already+have+%5B%5BCritique+of+technology%5D%5D+and+%5B%5BNeo-luddism%5D%5D+among+several+others.+%22Development%22+as+a+subject+for+criticism+has+many+more+meanings+than+%22technological+development%2C%22+which+is+either+%28a%29+vague%2C+%28b%29+value-laden%2C+or+%28c%29+duplicitous+of+a+better+defined+subject.+The+disambiguation+page+for+%22Development%22+lists+no+form+of+%22development%22+that+fits+with+the+general+%22technological%22+subject+of+this+page.Expired ], concern was: Looks more like a category or stand-alone list than an article. Even then, both the subject and inclusion criteria are unclear. If this refers to a particular field of study, most of the names on the list do not belong. If it refers to a particular outlook on technology, we already have Critique of technology and Neo-luddism among several others. "Development" as a subject for criticism has many more meanings than "technological development," which is either (a) vague, (b) value-laden, or (c) duplicitous of a better defined subject. The disambiguation page for "Development" lists no form of "development" that fits with the general "technological" subject of this page.
Nominator: Please consider notifying the author/project: {{subst:proposed deletion notify|Development criticism|concern=Looks more like a category or stand-alone list than an article. Even then, both the subject and inclusion criteria are unclear. If this refers to a particular field of study, most of the names on the list do not belong. If it refers to a particular outlook on technology, we already have ] and ] among several others. "Development" as a subject for criticism has many more meanings than "technological development," which is either (a) vague, (b) value-laden, or (c) duplicitous of a better defined subject. The disambiguation page for "Development" lists no form of "development" that fits with the general "technological" subject of this page.}} ~~~~
Timestamp: 20140205142859 14:28, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Administrators: delete |
