This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 64.223.120.132 (talk) at 18:11, 19 June 2006 (rv, edit detracts from quality of wiki). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:11, 19 June 2006 by 64.223.120.132 (talk) (rv, edit detracts from quality of wiki)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Perverted-Justice.com (also known as PeeJ) is an organization based in Portland, Oregon, dedicated to identifying adults willing to have chat room sexual encounters with minors. PeeJ consists of around 40 adult volunteers who carry out sting operations by posing as minors with names like "sara_so_bored," and waiting for older men to approach them in chat rooms. After obtaining identifying information from these men, who may offer their telephone numbers and other details so that meetings can be arranged, PeeJ either passes the information to law-enforcement, or places the "chat-log" and other relevant details on their website.
Set up in 2002 by an Oregon man, Xavier von Erck (aka Phillip John Eide), the organization says that its online operations have led to the exposure of over 772 men and the convictions of 58, as of May 18, 2006. Von Erck is also credited with locating a 14-year-old girl who was kidnapped, raped, and tortured by a 47-year-old man she met online.
Von Erck, who said he got the idea for the website while watching men attempt to groom young girls in chat rooms in Oregon, says that PeeJ is a computer watchdog agency that works closely with law-enforcement agencies. "The media likes to use the term 'vigilante' because it gets attention, but we don't consider ourselves vigilantes. We cultivate cooperation with police and work within the law to get justice, not outside of the law."
Methods
Perverted-Justice.com functions by supporting volunteers who act as bait in chat rooms where children and minors can typically be found. The volunteers' public profiles generally have youthful-sounding usernames and pictures of children. The administrators of the site say they do not initiate online contact with the men they pursue, and also refuse to act on tips from Internet users in order to reduce the risk that someone might use the website to take revenge. The administrators also say that their volunteers do not look for targets in adult chatrooms. If a man starts chatting to the volunteer and turns the conversation to sex, the volunteer attempts to persuade the man to divulge personal details, particularly a telephone number, ostensibly needed to verify the man's identity so that a meeting can be arranged.
In the past, around this point the chatlog and details would be published on the site. However, in December 2003, the organization set up its Information First program, in which interested police departments could contact Perverted-Justice.com, and any "busts" made within that department's jurisdiction would be sent straight to them without being posted to the website . In the early days of the program, Perverted-Justice.com did not initiate contact with the police, professedly because officers were skeptical that its information could be used in a court of law.
However, ever since July 2004 when they made their first conviction, the site's operators switched to a policy of cold calling local police with the information they obtained . If a government agency is interested (police, FBI, military CID, etc.) then the chatlog and other information is not posted to the site until after a conviction has been reached.
Under both their Information First program and their cold-calling policy, it is only when no agency expresses interest in the information that a log appears on the site. This is apparently done on the grounds that, if the government is not interested in pursuing action, then family members and neighbors should at least be informed. (Logs are also posted after the person has been convicted in a court of law.)
In such cases, using the telephone number, the site's volunteers do a reverse-directory check to obtain the man's name, as well as checking on the Web for any other information they can find about him. They then post his name, address, and photograph if he has supplied one, on the website, as well as the chat log: a record of the conversation he had with the volunteer. In a process called "Follow-up," additional volunteers on the site's forums, operating under rules and restrictions set up by Perverted-Justice.com administrators, contact the man's family, friends, neighbors, and employer to alert them to the website posting . The intent of this is ostensibly to warn anyone who may know the man about his activities and persuade them to help convince the man to receive counseling. The volunteers in these "Follow-up Forums" number in the thousands.
The site offers men who have been exposed the right of reply, allowing them either to defend or apologize for their actions, and posting their responses. The site's operators also occasionally remove information from the site if the target shows, for example, that he is receiving counseling .
All telephone numbers are removed from the site's main pages after two months (though still available on the site's forums), to avoid another case like that of the Milwaukee bank teller, who received a threatening phone call from a man who had obtained her number from the website. The woman had never been online or even owned a computer, and was forced to change her number, which had previously been registered to the subject of a Perverted-Justice.com sting .
Currently, the site only operates within the United States, but plans to expand into Canada .
Media
Volunteers also take part in what the site's operators call "group media busts," where men are invited to a house with the promise of a sexual encounter with a minor. When the man arrives, he is greeted by a television news reporter. The site teamed up with Dateline NBC in New York in November 2004 to conduct a large sting operation, or "group media bust," in which Dateline rented a house and wired it with hidden cameras, while volunteers posed as minors in chat rooms, telling men who approached them that they were home alone. "Within hours there were men literally lining up at our door," Dateline reported. In two-and-a-half days, 18 men showed up at the house after making a date with a perverted-justice.com volunteer .
On November 4 2005, Dateline aired another special which featured the site's volunteers catching child predators. Among the men who responded: an ER doctor, a special education teacher and a rabbi.
A third special was aired on February 3 2006; in this case, Riverside County, California, sheriff's deputies were contacted ahead of time, and waited outside the house to arrest the men as they left . Fifty such men were arrested over the course of three days near the bait house, located in Mira Loma, California, with 49 of them arrested for felonies. Two men were detained and released pending investigation . Von Erck says that this was the first group media bust with the full involvement of law enforcement . Also in February 2006, Perverted-justice.com conducted another operation in cooperation with law enforcement, this time in Laguna Beach, California, netting 13 men with criminal charges .
In April 2006, Perverted Justice was reportedly paid over $100,000 by Dateline NBC to participate in another "media bust" yet to be broadcast . In accordance with local law, several contributors were also deputized in Darke County, Ohio before carrying out the sting operation.
Convictions
The Web site documents 61 convictions across the United States attributed to its sting operations, with 33 of these taking place in 2005. Convictions have included disorderly conduct, indecently soliciting a child, attempting to entice a juvenile to travel with intent to engage in sexual act, transporting child pornography, and possession and dissemination of child pornography.
The site has relationships with police agencies around the U.S. and with the military police, who have proceeded with courts-martial on the basis of chat logs.
The site's organizers established their "Information First" police program in December 2003, in which police departments make arrangements to have the chat logs handed to them for follow up before being posted on the perverted-justice.com website, in order to safeguard potential prosecutions. The organization has also worked in conjunction with the ChildSeek Network, Counter Pedophilia Investigative Unit, and PoliceWorld.net.
In September 2004, site administrators helped locate a 14-year-old girl from Camas, Washington, who had been missing from her foster home for almost two weeks. Local detectives were unable to follow leads on the girl's computer, citing lack of knowledge and resources. The girl's mother believed the computer might hold the key to the girl's location and contacted Von Erck, who noticed that the girl had logged in several times to her Yahoo! account, only to log out again. Von Erck was able to obtain the IP address of the computer the girl had logged in from; using this, the Internet Service Provider located the address. When police arrived at the house, they found the girl half-naked and lying in the fetal position, with her hair cut and dyed, in a darkened room containing a video camera and restraining devices. She had met her 47-year-old kidnapper, who was raping her when the police knocked on the door, in a chat room. He was subsequently charged with child rape and unlawful imprisonment.
Criticism
Perverted-Justice.com, as well as its volunteers, have been criticized over the years by a number of individuals and organizations. In the FAQ at their site, they claim the criticism against them lacks coherence, that none of the criticisms made are unanswerable, and many criticisms stem from objections to age of consent laws.
The critics (or former critics) of the site include the U.S. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), among others. Tina Schwartz, NCMEC director of communication, has said: "It's really not the safest, most effective way to combat this problem ... From what I've seen ... they embarrass the people, but I don't know that complete justice is ever served". This statement was made before convictions were a regular occurrence on the site.
Scott Morrow of Corrupted-Justice.com, a Web site set up to challenge perverted-justice.com, has made a large number of attacks on the organization, and claims credit for a number of changes to Perverted-Justice methods. Perverted-Justice replied to this claim by stating that Corrupted-Justice did not have anything to do with any changes. Volunteers and supporters of Perverted-Justice.com founded the website Corrupted-Justice.net in response to Corrupted-Justice.com, and have revealed ties between Corrupted-Justice.com and pro-pedophile groups, including NAMBLA.
Scott Morrow told ABC News there is currently no way to hold Von Erck or any other administrators, operators, or volunteers at perverted-justice.com accountable for mistakes. "When you're running an organization or running a group of people with the potential to do as much damage to people's lives as this does, I think there also has to be some accountability." Accountability could take the form of legal action against the site or its operators. However, the only known instance of legal action against perverted-justice.com was a petition for a restraining order, issuing out of a complaint of harassment, against two volunteers in Minnesota. The judge dismissed the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction over the respondents, but also stated that there were issues of administrative enforceability against non-resident respondents and that there was no evidence that the respondents had themselves participated in any harassing acts.
Morrow has also criticized perverted-justice.com as not respecting the legal presumption that all people are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, characterizing their tactics as "vigilantism" and "terrorization".
Lee Tien, an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, is quoted as being concerned that the organization could send real predators into hiding. The site's operators respond that this is in fact their goal, to have real predators hide away from the places that children go; they liken the site to putting up a Community Watch sign at a local playground, which could be argued to discourage predators from kidnapping children there. Tien also argued that chat transcripts can be easily doctored. In order to bolster credibility, the organization has implemented a number of safeguards to prevent this from happening, including routing all chats through an encrypted proxy server that mirrors the data. This system has been upheld in court.
Some law-enforcement agencies have also stated that, while they appreciate the site's mission, they do not agree with some of the operators' and volunteers' practices. In a December 2004 article in the New York Sun, Bradley Russ, the training director for the federal Internet Crimes Against Children Taskforce, which employs about 200 federal agents nationwide, said the tactics of perverted-justice.com sometimes run counter to the task force's standards. For instance, Russ said, by accepting child pornography from their "busts" to bolster a potential legal case, the volunteers are themselves in possession of unlawful images. He said federal authorities have begun considering whether to seize "PeeJ" contributors' computers. "It's a noble effort gone too far," Russ told the newspaper. He also said the site's tactics can make it more difficult for law enforcement to prosecute cases they present because those cases can be considered tainted by entrapment claims.
Von Erck replies that, "No officer we've worked with has bashed us. No officer who has made an arrest hand-in-hand with Perverted-Justice.com has raised a voice against us." Furthermore, they do not consider their methods to be entrapment, arguing that they initiate nothing, and instead wait for their target to come to them. No case brought to court so far has had any complications with regards to entrapment claims.
As to the reports on child pornography, the site's operators state that when they or their volunteers are sent child pornography, they "immediately report it to the police and without fail." Furthermore, every time this has happened has resulted in a conviction against the one sending the pornography, not against perverted-justice.com, the operators say.
See also
References
- ^ Perverted-Justice.com main web site
- ^ "Perverted-Justice.com convictions", Perverted-Justice.com
- ^ Riemland, Kim "Internet Sleuth Finds Kidnapped Teen", Komo 1000 News, September 14, 2004
- Kennedy, Tracy. "Vigilante Web site used to charge city man", The Register Citizen, October 13, 2004
- "Information for Police", Perverted-Justice.com, retrived March 6 2006
- "Perverted-Justice.com conviction report for jaydan003", Perverted-Justice.com, retrieved March 6 2006
- ^ "Controversial Web Site Claims to 'Out' Would-Be Child Molesters" by Jonathan Silverstein, ABC News, 10 January 2005
- "If you have a chat-log posted on Perverted-Justice.com...", Perverted-Justice.com, retrieved March 7 2006
- "Bank teller's phone number mistakenly posted on predator website", Associated Press, 29 September 2004
- "CKNW Radio Interview with Xavier Von Erck and Scott Morrow" by Peter Watten, CKNW, August 2004
- "Dangers Children face Online" by Chris Hansen, Dateline NBC, November 11 2004
- "To Catch a Predator III", Dateline NBC, February 3 2006
- Riverside County Sheriff's Department Press Release, Jurupa Valley Station, January 13 2006
- PE News Local (registration required)
- "13 charged with attempted child molest after days of exchanging lewd instant messages and coming to meet a 12 or 13-year-old girl", by Tony Rackauckas (District Attorney), Orange County District Attorney Press Release, February 22 2006
- "'Dateline' Pedophile Sting: One More Point", by Paul Farhi, Washington Post, April 9, 2006
- "Teen recovers after frightful imprisonment by older man", Katu News, 13 September 2004
- Perverted-Justice.com Archives, Perverted-Justise.com, retrieved March 6 2006
- "What about critics of the website?", from the Perverted-Justice.com FAQ, retrieved April 24 2006
- "Online group involved in man's arrest," Roanoke Times, 22 January 2005
- "Undercutting CJ.com's claims of accomplishments", Corrupted-Justice.net, August 28 2005
- "Undercutting CJ.com's claims of accomplishments, yet again.", Corrupted-Justice.net, January 14 2006
- "CJ'er Info: Matty Carpenter", Corrupted-Justice.net, May 2 2005
- "CJ.com: A Favorite of Pedophiles", Corrupted-Justice.net, December 18 2005
- "Pictures worth a thousand words: The Failure of the Cison HRO", Corrupted-Justise.net, September 11 2005
- "Mission Statement 2", Corrupted-Justice.com, retrieved March 6 2006
- "'Vigilante' Web Site Posts 'Pedophile' Information", WBAL11, February 26 2004
- "Aren't you just driving potential pedophiles further underground with Followup, making it more difficuilt for them to be caught?" from the Perverted-Justice.com FAQ, retrieved March 6 2006
- "Firefighter Nabbed by Cyber-Vigilantes" by Geoffrey Gray, The New York Sun, December 29 2004
- "I read an article where a cop bashed you guys, why was that?" from the Perverted-Justice.com FAQ, retrieved March 6 2006
- "Is it entrapment?" from the Perverted-Justice.com FAQ, retrieved March 6 2006
- "Is it true that contributors send out pics of child porn when they are doing a bust? That's where they get their pictures!" from the Perverted-Justice.com FAQ, retrieved March 6 2006
- General Reference: "Good ol' hiding in plain sight" by Xavier von Erck, AngryGerman blog, retrieved 6 March 2006 (Used to confirm Xavier's real name, against claims of Xavier being a pseudonym)
Further reading
- Perverted Justice official website
- Other news articles about Perverted-Justice can be found at the "PeeJ in the News Archive"
- Corrupted-Justice.com, a website critical of perverted-justice.com
- Corrupted-Justice.net, a rebuttal website to the claims of corrupted-justice.com.