Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dr.K. (talk | contribs) at 05:55, 10 March 2014 (Reverted edits by Fuavudalang (talk) to last version by Dr.K.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

• WP:AIV

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
   • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.

This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.

This page was last updated at 07:16 on 27 December 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

• Shakeelkhanfn (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Keeps removing well-cited content from Queen (film), in spite of multiple warnings on talk page. Account created just to vandalize this page. Nadesai (talk) 03:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

• 75.191.173.190 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Persistent, unexplained, uncited, voluminous edits to existing, objective, well-sourced climate data. Refuses to communicate. Needs to be stopped until they are willing to communicate. AN/I incorrectly seemed to think it was solely a content dispute. —— 07:28, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. If AN/I decided it was a content dispute, then we really can't do anything here because they have higher standards than we do. Someone mentioned taking it to ANEW, and that might be better, although it is increasingly looking like forum shopping. Daniel Case (talk) 14:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

@Daniel Case: I've had no previous involvement or knowledge of the case, so it really can't be forum shopping. One of the affected templates was on my watchlist, so I became interested. Regardless of a content dispute, the IP user's edits fail on policy grounds (no cites for controversial edits) and they refuse to communicate. Is it really better to just let them burn other users' time having to clean up after them and then request protection on individual articles (which has been granted) instead of just stopping the problem at the source? —— 17:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

• Andrewmhhs (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 65.34.81.201 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Both users have vandalized the Star Wars: The Clone Wars (2008 TV series) page inbox by re-adding the March 7, 2014 ending date. AdamDeanHall (talk) 19:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently.  Ronhjones  21:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

• IPadPerson (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On DJ Khaled (diff):. Blanking content on a BLP without giving a valid reason, after being given a final warning yesterday for blanking on a different BLP. STATic message me! 01:21, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Deville (Talk) 02:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

• 119.252.162.67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalized (diff) after recently receiving last warning Flyer22 (talk) 04:51, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Warned user. (Still not up to level 4 warning though) - Vianello (Talk) 05:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

• Fuavudalang (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On User talk:Will Beback (diff): vandalism after final warning. Advocates use of socks. Disruptive editing. Edit-warring across many pages. Δρ.Κ.  05:46, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages vandalism
• Administrative backlog