This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Flat Out (talk | contribs) at 01:39, 26 March 2014 (Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Ed Manion. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:39, 26 March 2014 by Flat Out (talk | contribs) (Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Ed Manion. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
March 2014
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ed Manion has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ed Manion was changed by Connor2278 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.920739 on 2014-03-26T00:36:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:36, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Ed Manion, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 00:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Ed Manion shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Flat Out let's discuss it 01:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)