Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Penwhale (talk | contribs) at 20:17, 30 April 2014 (→Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun control closed: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your comments on the Gun control workshop

I have collapsed the comments and personal attacks you made regarding Seraphimblade and threats to leave, your comments are disruptive and are bordering on being a polemic. If you wish to make a comments they must be reasonable and civil and not cast aspersions. If you continue to make inappropriate comments, you may be sanctioned (including a ban from participating in the case or a block) as a clerk action. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:11, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

You're not a listed clerk for this case. Of course you have collapsed my comments. The accused will be silent! -Justanonymous (talk) 13:13, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

For the record, just because he's not a listed clerk does not mean that he cannot perform clerk actions. For what it's worth, your argument - based on what is currently on the Workshops page - are borderline personal attacks (compare the difference in using "The decision is bullcrap" and "You are bullcrap" - the former criticizes the decision, the latter criticizes the person making the decision). I fully agree with him as to why he collapsed those comments. - Penwhale | 02:10, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Gun control arbitration proposed decision

Hello. You are named as a party to the Gun control arbitration case. The committee is now voting on its decision for this case, and findings and/or remedies relating to your conduct have been proposed. The decision is being voted on at the Proposed decision page. Comments on the decision can be made at the Proposed decision talk page. As voting is underway, please submit promptly any comments you wish the arbitrators to consider. Thank you. For the Arbitration Committee, AGK 11:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun control closed

The above named arbitration case has closed, and final decisions are now available at the link above. The following remedies were passed:

1. Standard discretionary sanctions are authorised for any edit about, and for all pages relating to, gun control;
2. AndyTheGrump (talk · contribs) reminded that further edit-warring as well as incivility will likely result in serious sanctions;
3. Gaijin42 (talk · contribs), Justanonymous (talk · contribs), and ROG5728 (talk · contribs) are topic-banned from making any edit about, and from editing any page relating to, gun control;
4. Goethean (talk · contribs) reminded that further incivility as well as unnecessary antagonism may result in sanctions;
5. North8000 (talk · contribs) is indefinitely site-banned from the English Language Misplaced Pages; appeals of this ban may be requested no earlier than twelve months since the date the case closed. The twelve-month period of the ban under this remedy is reset if new infringements of the sock puppetry policy occur. In addition, North8000 (talk · contribs) is also indefinitely topic-banned from making any edit about, and from editing any page relating to, gun control. The topic ban that North8000 was subject to due to the Tea Party case remains in force.

The topic-ban remedies passed in this case may not be appealed for at least twelve months, and another twelve months must pass for each subsequent appeal.

For the Arbitration Committee,
- Penwhale | 20:17, 30 April 2014 (UTC)