Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fang Aili (talk | contribs) at 18:57, 26 June 2006 (Re:db-bio articles). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Re:db-bio articles

Hello Ste4k, you're welcome. You'll notice that I removed the tags and suggested you use {{prod}} or AfD instead, since the articles asserted notability. If you think they're non-notable you can certainly go ahead with the prod or afd. Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers! --Fang Aili 18:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Mediation Geurilla

Hello! Just droping in. A quick evaluation of the situation quickly tells me that the main problem isn't one person or the other, and you both need to cool down a little bit so we can talk rationally. Thanks for your understanding. Now, before we begin, let's go over some basic courtesy that everyone should be given:

'Please read and deeply contemplate the meaning of the following fundamental philosophies of being nice':

• Avoid making nasty personal attacks (Mean statements directed at a users character), we need to talk about Misplaced Pages not each other.
• Be nice to each other, that's the only way anything gets done. If both parties are mean and unsympathizing, then no one will get what they want.
• Assume good faith in other editor's intentions. Misplaced Pages allows anyone to edit, so obviously we trust that everyone has good intentions when it comes to using it. If everyone were out to harm Misplaced Pages... well... we'd just be screwed.
• Basically... play nice  :)
  
  

If everyone is in agreement with the above philosophies, then let's have a nice lovely sit down with a delicious bagel and discuss what's going on. Shall we? -- The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake 17:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Can I move this to the top of the screen please? Ste4k 17:50, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Feel free. Oh, and by the way, that discussion on my talk page was involving a different dispute, so everything we're doing will be here, yes. -- The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake 18:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

What discussion? On the bottom was the person who was harrassing me. I am 0RR. (religiously) They didn't like my edits, it was all based on their sources, they refused to talk to me, then they started harrassing. Most of them were just IP addresses. I don't know where to go exactly, so I started with a WP:3O, it still sitting on the bottom of the page. It's marked "dispute". It said to be neutral. AmiDaniels suggested an RfC. So I opened one too, etc. It's listed under the literature/media section over there. There might be some conversation on his talk page to, but I really don't care to check. :) Ste4k 18:16, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Housemates Table and Original Research

Please see the talk page of BB06 to discuss the use of the housemates table in the article -- CHANLORD / 02:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

The helpme request

In case someone asks in the future, I finally found the list of currently activated extensions. (Located here). Thanks for responding to my request.--SomeStranger 12:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Archives

• Archive 0 - 17 June 2006 05:01 - Sun, 25 Jun 2006 06:04:20 +0000

Archive Procedure

People That Do not Know how to read will start there messages below, WATCH! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ste4k (talk • contribs)

(And people who do not know how to spell will use the word "there" when they really mean to use the word "their," WATCH!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Parodi (talk • contribs)

Authorship of A Course In Miracles article

I'll be brief. I am not posting on the talk page anymore because there is a great deal of arguing there that I am not interested in.

I posted to your talk page because you are the only one who has voiced the concern that the article is not important.

I'm not going back to the talk page of that article because it's too ugly. If you want to talk about it, we'll have to do it via our respective talk pages. -- Andrew Parodi 03:00, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

PS: Regarding your suggestion that I have an "attachment" to that article, I actually have an attachment to everything I write. I can't imagine writing something that I don't have attachment to. You have no more right to tell me not to have attachments to what I write than I do to tell you to HAVE attachments to what you write. To each his own. -- Andrew Parodi 03:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Ste4k wrote: I am going to ignore you on my talk page now. I consider your attitude harrassing. Thanks.

I'll get some "ice" and "chill off" the same point when you get a life and chill off.

I have no understanding of why you make such objective statements about articles about whose content you demonstrate no objective understanding.

The fact that you are only one contesting the "importance" of the article is "sourced" in the article's talk page. The arbitrator of that article, a completely neutral person, even referred to your contesting of the article's importance as "nonsense."

As for the accusation of "harrassment," funny. You have had an arrogant and condescending attitude with that article all the way through, not just to me but the other editors. Oh, and that statement is sourced by reading the talk page of the article in question. -- Andrew Parodi 03:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Template:Guerrilla-mediation-request This person is harrassing me.