This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wee Curry Monster (talk | contribs) at 11:47, 6 May 2014 (←Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=yes <!-- Please do not enter anything in the subject/headline box! If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:47, 6 May 2014 by Wee Curry Monster (talk | contribs) (←Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=yes <!-- Please do not enter anything in the subject/headline box! If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above...')(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Keysanger
Keysanger (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Keysanger/Archive.
06 May 2014
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Chelios123 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
I originally prepared this case in November 2013, I decided against filing when Keysanger blanked his page and appeared to retire . Chelios' contributions followed a similar pattern, stopping at the end of last year.
On 21 April Keysanger began editing again, followed shortly after by Chelios123. Chelios started of with a revert of material on Chile–Peru football rivalry which was one of the reasons I very nearly filed the original report.
User:Keysanger has been keen to remove all references to orders of a Repaso from War of the Pacific for years see . (This is the Spanish equivalent to a No quarter order. There has been a long standing consensus to include such material on the basis of a wealth of sources. When Keysanger brought the subject up yet again, User:Chelios123 appeared as a new editor and began to take his side in the content dispute.
In addition, User:Keysanger regularly refers to the topic ban imposed on User:MarshalN20, User:Chelios123 also referred to it to a 3RR posting and in a post to User:Sandstein (this lead to a contested blocked based on a weak association with the topic ban that was subsequently over-turned). In the recent dispute on Chile–Peru football rivalry, Chelios has been edit warring back the mention of the War of the Pacific that was the tenuous link that led to the contested block.
Disclosure I have been involved and tried to mediate the content dispute back in 2009. Talk:War of the Pacific/Archive 9#Neutral Comment and Observation when I edited under my real name. I also consider both User:Keysanger and User:MarshalN20 to be wiki friends and have tried to mediate between both in the past. As a friend of both, it has been difficult for me to bring this to SPI and I honestly hope I'm wrong. However, per WP:DUCK it seems likely and I can't in good conscience continue to ignore it. Especially as there seems to be a pattern of baiting around Marshal's topic ban. WCMemail 11:47, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: