Misplaced Pages

User talk:Arthur Ellis

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pete Peters (talk | contribs) at 21:58, 27 June 2006 (RV This isn't Vandalism, you are under investigstion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:58, 27 June 2006 by Pete Peters (talk | contribs) (RV This isn't Vandalism, you are under investigstion)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Multi-user iconAn editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Ceraurus (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to RFCU for evidence.
Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Arthur Ellis talk page

Rachel Marsden

Something you're doing in your edits is causing the reference formatting to screw up; instead of listing properly, every reference after #6 is running together as an undifferentiated and unformatted block of text. I can't locate where the problem is, however — could you please stop editing the footnotes until we can solve the matter? Thanks. Bearcat 00:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)


Sure. I don't know what the problem is. Mostly, I just wanted to tighten and copy-edit.Arthur Ellis 00:40, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

I'll see if I can get an administrator with more experience in the technical coding aspects to review what was happening, but in the meantime I'll have to revert the changes so that the reference list goes back to its proper code formatting. I'm not expressing an opinion on the quality of your edits, I hasten to add; this is strictly a technical matter. Bearcat 00:46, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

It was an easy fix. I took out FN 6, which was of a non-controversial point (no one claims she doesn't write for the Toornto Sun, I hope). Now the footnotes work and I've copy-edited the piece.Arthur Ellis 01:32, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Green Party of Canada

When editing an article on Misplaced Pages there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Ardenn 16:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Jim Harris didn't resign as leader, he only announced that he wouldn't run again. Thus he is still leader until after the convention is over, and they "change over." Ardenn 16:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Arthur Ellis, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ardenn 16:07, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Mediation question

You left a message on the Medcab case page concerning Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-06-25 Battle of the Lower Dnieper stating, I would mediate this one if parties are agreeable. Arthur Ellis 01:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC). Does this mean that you will attempt to mediate the case? I put it in the cases in mediation section, but I just wanted to be sure someone was looking into the matter. Thanks. Cowman109 03:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Mediation

Thank you for your responce at Talk:Battle_of_the_Lower_Dnieper#Mediation. Please show up also at Misplaced Pages:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-06-25_Battle_of_the_Lower_Dnieper#Mediator_response.--AndriyK 09:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Re:Battle of the Lower Dnieper

I certainly have no objections if you mediate this case. :) -- Grafikm 10:08, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Category: